Table IV.
Comparison of diagnostic coincidence rates of different detection methods between tubal and intrauterine pregnancy group.
| Group | No. | β-HCG | CT-IgG | Endometrial thickness | Combined detection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tubal pregnancy group | 55 | 28 (50.9%) | 41 (74.5%) | 45 (81.8%) | 53 (96.4%) |
| P-valuea | 0.0152 | 0.0454 | |||
| P-valueb | 0.0113 | 0.0325 | 0.0374 | ||
| Intrauterine pregnancy group | 55 | 34 (61.8%) | 43 (78.2%) | 49 (89.1%) | 54 (98.2%) |
| P-valuea | 0.0207 | 0.0416 | |||
| P-valueb | 0.0127 | 0.0289 | 0.0473 |
a
Compared with endometrial thickness
b
compared with combined detection. β-HCG, β-human chorionic gonadotropin; CT-IgG, Chlamydia trachomatis immunoglobulin G.