Table 3.
Health stateb utilities | Italy (n = 238)
|
UK (n = 209)
|
Difference between Italy and the UK
|
t-test
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | t-statistic | p-value | |
A. Oral treatment only | 0.900 (0.097) | 0.888 (0.120) | 0.012 (0.108) | 1.132 | 0.258 |
Health states with oral and injectable treatment | |||||
B. Reconstitution, waiting, needle handling | 0.868 (0.109) | 0.858 (0.165) | 0.010 (0.138) | 0.779 | 0.437 |
C. Reconstitution, waiting | 0.872 (0.109) | 0.863 (0.161) | 0.009 (0.136) | 0.681 | 0.496 |
D. Reconstitution, needle handling | 0.879 (0.102) | 0.868 (0.159) | 0.011 (0.132) | 0.885 | 0.377 |
E. Reconstitution | 0.884 (0.100) | 0.874 (0.157) | 0.010 (0.130) | 0.804 | 0.422 |
F. Needle handling | 0.884 (0.101) | 0.874 (0.156) | 0.010 (0.130) | 0.781 | 0.435 |
G. No inconveniences | 0.890 (0.100) | 0.878 (0.156) | 0.012 (0.129) | 0.989 | 0.323 |
Notes:
UK data adapted with permission from Matza LS, Boye KS, Stewart KD, Davies EW, Paczkowski R. Health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:774;11
health states B to G include health state A, plus treatment with a weekly injection. Independent t-tests were used.
Abbreviation: TTO, time trade-off.