Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;12:971–979. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S159620

Table 3.

t-tests comparing TTO scores between countries (Italy vs UKa) (N = 447)

Health stateb utilities Italy (n = 238)
UK (n = 209)
Difference between Italy and the UK
t-test
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) t-statistic p-value
A. Oral treatment only 0.900 (0.097) 0.888 (0.120) 0.012 (0.108) 1.132 0.258
Health states with oral and injectable treatment
 B. Reconstitution, waiting, needle handling 0.868 (0.109) 0.858 (0.165) 0.010 (0.138) 0.779 0.437
 C. Reconstitution, waiting 0.872 (0.109) 0.863 (0.161) 0.009 (0.136) 0.681 0.496
 D. Reconstitution, needle handling 0.879 (0.102) 0.868 (0.159) 0.011 (0.132) 0.885 0.377
 E. Reconstitution 0.884 (0.100) 0.874 (0.157) 0.010 (0.130) 0.804 0.422
 F. Needle handling 0.884 (0.101) 0.874 (0.156) 0.010 (0.130) 0.781 0.435
 G. No inconveniences 0.890 (0.100) 0.878 (0.156) 0.012 (0.129) 0.989 0.323

Notes:

a

UK data adapted with permission from Matza LS, Boye KS, Stewart KD, Davies EW, Paczkowski R. Health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:774;11

b

health states B to G include health state A, plus treatment with a weekly injection. Independent t-tests were used.

Abbreviation: TTO, time trade-off.