Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;13:1099–1109. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S166100

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of the discrimination performance of GRACE RS and CHA2DS2-VASc score in the prediction of post-MI NOAF.

Note: ap-value represents the comparison of C-statistics between GRACE RS and CHA2DS2-VASc score. (A) For the overall cohort, GRACE RS was significantly better than CHA2DS2-VASc score and both risk scores demonstrated excellent calibration; (B and C) illustrated that GRACE RS appeared to be better than CHA2DS2-VASc score for both men and women, respectively; (D to F) showed the comparisons between GRACE RS and CHA2DS2-VASc score based on risk stratification (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively).

Abbreviations: GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; HLS, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic; MI, myocardial infarction; NOAF, new-onset atrial fibrillation; RS, risk score.