Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2018 Jan 17;25(7):825–832. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.010

Table 5.

Agreement between three categories of patient management proposed by surgeons based on outside and second opinion reports, compared with actual patient management as found on the clinical report system (surgery summaries, pathology, blood tests, and additional imaging exams). Weighted kappa with squared weights was used to assess agreement.

PATIENTS’ CLINICAL MANAGEMENT AFTER 6 MONTHS FROM RADIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT
Surgeon 1 Surgeon 2


Surgery Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Chemotherapy Weighted kappa (95% CI) agreement Surgery Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Chemotherapy Weighted kappa (95% CI) agreement
MANAGEMENT AS PROPOSED AFTER READING OUTSIDE REPORTS

Surgery 6 2 10 3 2 6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 1 0 8 0.426 (0,2489–0,6031) 3 0 7 0.4136 (0,2149–0,6129)
Chemotherapy 0 0 38 1 0 43

MANAGEMENT AS PROPOSED AFTER READING SECOND OPINION REPORTS

Surgery 3 0 1 5 0 3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 3 2 7 0.6467 (0.4014–0.892) 2 2 9 0.6262 (0.3954–0.857)
Chemotherapy 1 0 48 0 0 44