Table 4.
Comparison of the emergence of Test Partner-oriented Behaviour between conditions (linear GLMM; significant differences are indicated with coloured background).
| Social test partners | Non-social test partners | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfamiliar dog | Familiar dog II | Unfamiliar object | Familiar object | ||
| Social test partners | Familiar dog I |
B ± SE = −0.562 ± 0.128 t112 = −4.381 p < 0.001 |
p = 0.334 | p = 0.825 | p = 0.539 |
| Unfamiliar dog | — |
B ± SE = 0.352 ± 0.127 t112 = −2.779 p = 0.038 |
B ± SE = 0.590 ± 0.127 t112 = 4.652 p < 0.001 |
B ± SE = 0.714 ± 0.127 t112 = 5.631 p < 0.001 |
|
| Familiar dog II | — | — | p = 0.256 |
B ± SE = 0.362 ± 0.124 t112 = 2.924 p = 0.029 |
|
| Non-social test partners | Unfamiliar object | — | — | — | p = 0.539 |
For significant explanatory variables in the final models, we provide contrast estimates (B ± SE) and t values. Familiar dog I stands for the first, Familiar dog II stands for the last trial.