Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 5;9:747. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00747

Table 3.

Results from one-way ANOVA on the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the shoot and root dry weight biomass and root: shoot ratio of 75 and 30 day-old rice plants from a field (Exp-2) and a greenhouse experiment (PB1) in 2013.

Treatments Shoot DW (g) Root DW (g) Root DW/ Shoot DW
Field 2013 (Exp-2) Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE

Fungicide (F) 2.17 ± 0.38b 1.02 ± 0.08b 0.50 ± 0.07a
Nonmycorrhizal (NM) 2.65 ± 0.48b 1.19 ± 0.27a 0.45 ± 0.04a
Mycorrhizal (M) 3.94 ± 0.36a 1.25 ± 0.21a 0.34 ± 0.08a
(32.7%) (4.8%) (-32.4%)
F2,6 12.15 0.38 2.15
P-value 0.008 0.699 0.198
GH 2013 (PB1)
Nonmycorrhizal (NM) 0.88 ± 0.05b 0.51 ± 0.05a 0.57 ± 0.05a
Mycorrhizal (M) 1.09 ± 0.06a 0.60 ± 0.04a 0.56 ± 0.04a
(19.3%) (15.0%) (-1.8%)
F1,11 6.53 2.46 0.02
P-value 0.027 0.145 0.901

DW = Dry Weight. Mean values followed by different letters within columns indicate a significant difference among treatments by Least Significant Difference mean comparisons (P < 0.05; LSD). Significant P-values are in bold. The F, NM, and M refer to AMF treatments of F: rice seeds + fungicides + sterilized AMF, NM: rice seeds + sterilized AMF, and M: rice seeds + live AMF. The relative change (%) in root, shoot and ratio was calculated by dividing the difference of AMF and non-AMF by AMF treatment.