. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2017 Nov 22;41(3):299–308. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9903-6

Table 3.

Baseline adjusted means and pairwise mean differences at 6 months for the 3 intervention groups

Variables	Adjusted means (95% CI): treatment groups			Mean differences (95% CI) for pairwise comparisons
Variables	WL Only	WL + AT	WL + RT	WL versus WL + AT	WL versus WL + RT	WL + AT versus WL + RT
SF-12 P	44.51	48.62	49.45	−4.11^*	−4.94^*	−0.82
SF-12 P	(42.60, 46.42)	(46.83, 50.41)	(47.60, 51.29)	(−7.91, −0.31)	(−8.82, −1.06)	(−4.57, 2.92)
SE for walk	57.43	79.99	67.13	−22.6^*	−9.70	12.86^*
SE for walk	(51.40, 63.47)	(74.27, 85.71)	(61.34, 72.91)	(−34.2, −11.0)	(−21.4, 2.00)	(1.51, 24.21)
SE for stairs	59.38	69.90	70.21	−10.5^*	−10.8^*	−0.31
SE for stairs	(54.23, 64.53)	(65.08, 74.73)	(65.31, 75.11)	(−20.5, −0.54)	(−20.9, −0.77)	(−10.0, 9.40)
SAT-F	0.08	1.31	1.77	−1.23^*	−1.69^*	−0.46
SAT-F	(−0.27, 0.43)	(0.98, 1.65)	(1.43, 2.11)	(−1.85, −0.62)	(−2.31, −1.07)	(−1.06, 0.14)

Confidence intervals for pairwise differences use a Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons

Mean differences signifies statistical significance at p < .05