. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2017 Nov 22;41(3):299–308. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9903-6

Table 4.

Baseline adjusted means and pairwise mean differences at 18 months for the 3 intervention groups

Variables	Adjusted means (95% CI): treatment groups			Mean differences (95% CI) for pairwise comparisons
Variables	WL only	WL + AT	WL + RT	WL versus WL + AT	WL versus WL + RT	WL + AT versus WL + RT
SF-12 P	43.08	48.50	47.92	−5.42^*	−4.83^*	0.58
SF-12 P	(41.04, 45.12)	(46.43, 50.57)	(45.92, 49.92)	(−9.64, −1.20)	(−9.01, −0.66)	(−3.60, 4.77)
SE for walk	56.09	79.81	68.06	−23.7^*	−12.0	11.75
SE for walk	(49.86, 62.32)	(73.56, 86.05)	(62.01, 74.10)	(−36.1, −11.3)	(−24.2, 0.23)	(−0.44, 23.94)
SE for stairs	60.56	68.05	70.87	−7.50	−10.3^*	−2.81
SE for stairs	(55.43, 65.68)	(63.01, 73.09)	(65.97, 75.76)	(−17.7, 2.68)	(−20.3, −0.28)	(−12.8, 7.12)
Sat-F	0.21	1.32	1.76	−1.11^*	−1.55^*	−0.45
Sat-F	(−0.15, 0.58)	(0.95, 1.69)	(1.41, 2.12)	(−1.78, −0.43)	(−2.21, −0.89)	(−1.11, 0.22)

Confidence intervals for pairwise differences use a Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons

Mean differences signifies statistical significance at p < .05