Table 3.
Authors, date | Purpose | Study design/ sampling | Sample size (n)/sample characteristics | Procedures and instruments | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cimprich, 1992 | To examine attention following surgery for breast cancer | Cross-sectional/ convenience sampling |
n=32 Female, stage I or II, underwent surgery for breast cancer |
Assessed attention and depression day before discharge from hospital following breast cancer surgery Attention Objective measures: DSF, DSB, SDMT, alphabet backward, letter cancellation Self-report: AFI Depression Self-report: VAMS |
Depression was significantly correlated with attention assessed by AFI No significant relationship between depression and attention measured by objective measures |
Freeman and Broshek, 2002 | To introduce each neuropsychological test and assess cognitive function in relation to emotional functioning in breast cancer patients | Cross-sectional/ convenience sampling |
n=17 Female, diagnosed with breast cancer In active treatment (n=8) Posttreatment (n=9) |
Cognitive function Objective measures: COWAT, HVLT, PASAT, RBANS, Stroop C-W Self-report: Rating cognitive function on a scale of 0-10 sDepression Self-report: CES-D |
Significant inverse relationship between self-rated cognitive function and depression Significant inverse relationship between depression and visual attention measured by Stroop test No relationship between depression and other objective measures |
Vearncombe et al., 2009 | To assess whether decline in cognitive function is associated with health, treatment and psychological variables | Longitudinal/ convenience sampling |
n=159 Female, early stage of breast cancer Undergoing chemotherapy (n=138) No chemotherapy (n=21) |
Assessed cognitive function and psychological status before (T0) and 4 months after (T2) chemotherapy Cognitive function Objective measures: AVLT, WMS-III, WAIS-III, SDMT, DKEFS Self-report: Test of everyday attention Anxiety and depression Self-report: HADS |
Association between changes in executive function (T2-T1) and baseline depression |
Alcalar et al., 2012 | To examine correlation between depression with coping styles and cognitive errors in breast cancer patients who have completed chemotherapy | Cross-sectional/ convenience sampling |
n=110 Female, surgery at least 6 months ago, Completed adjuvant chemotherapy Low depression (n=76) High depression (n=34) |
Categorized into two groups (depression vs. nondepression) and was assessed cognitive errors, coping styles, and automatic thought process Depression Self-report: BDI Cognitive errors Self-report: CEQ |
Relationship between depression and cognitive errors among breast cancer patients |
DSF: Digital Span Forward, DSB: Digital Span Backward, SDMT: Symbol Digit Modalities Test, AFI: Attentional Function Index, VAMS: Visual Analog Mood States, COWAT: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, HVLT: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, PASAT: Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task, RBANS: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, Stroop C-W: Stroop Interference Trial, CES-D: Center for epidemiological studies depression inventory, AVLT: Auditory verbal learning test, WMS-III: Wechsler Memory Scale, WAIS-III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, SDMT: Symbol digit modalities test, DKEFS: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale, HADS: Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale, BDI: Beck’s Depression Index, CEQ: Cognitive Error Questionnaire