Table 8.
Authors, date | Purpose | Study design/sampling | Sample size (n)/sample characteristics | Procedures and instruments | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cimprich et al., 2005 | To examine the relationship between cognitive function and pretreatment factors | Cross-sectional/convenience sampling |
n=184 Female, diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, before surgery for breast cancer |
Cognitive function Objective measures: DSF, DSB, TMA, TMB TS, TW Self-report: AFI Psychological statues Self-report: POMS-SF |
Small but significant relationship between overall mood states and objectively assessed cognitive function A significant relationship between overall mood states and subjectively assessed CI |
Menning et al., 2015 | To examine pretreatment cognitive function in breast cancer patients | Cross-sectional/convenience sampling |
n=103 Breast cancer (n=65) Female, underwent surgery Prechemotherapy (n=32); postchemotherapy (n=33) Healthy control (n=38) |
Assessed cognitive function, self-reported psychological functioning, and MRI in breast cancer patients who underwent surgery and those without cancer Cognitive function Objective measures: Neurological test, MRI Psychological status Self-report: HSCL-25, POMS |
Performance on verbal memory was associated with depression scores Processing speed was correlated with emotional functioning, overall psychological status, and anxiety |
DSF: Digit span forward, TMA: Trail making test A, TS: Three shape, TW: Three words, AFI: Attentional Function Index, POMS-SF: Profile Mood States-Short Form, DSB: Digit span backward, TMB: Trail making test B, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, HSCL-25: Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25, CI: Cognitive impairment