Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;12(5):e0006400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006400

Table 3. Prevalence of impetigo and adjusted odds ratio for variables in multivariate analysis.

Prevalence (%, 95% CI) aOR (95% CI), p value—multivariate analysis
Total 136/1396 (9.7%, 8.3–11.4)
Sex
Female 62/737 (8.4%, 6.6–10.6) Ref
Male 74/659 (11.2%, 9.0–13.9) 1.4 (1.0–2.1), p = 0.07
Site
Dili 41/502 (8.2%, 6.1–10.9) Ref
Ermera 95/894 (10.6%, 8.8–12.8) 0.9(0.6–1.5), p = 0.77
Age (years)
5–9 36/412 (8.7%, 6.4–11.9) Ref
10–14 66/615 (10.7%, 8.5–13.4) 1.2(0.7–1.8), p = 0.55
15–19 25/293 (8.5%, 5.8–12.3) 0.7(0.4–1.3), p = 0.31
20–24 9/76 (11.8%, 6.1–21.2) Insufficient data
Nutrition (n = 1264)
Not stunted 80/922 (8.7%, 7.0–10.7) Ref
Stunted 40/342 (11.7%, 8.7–15.6) 1.1 (0.7–1.8), 0.60
Scabies
No scabies 69/1084 (6.4%, 5.1–8.0) Ref
Scabies 67/312 (21.5%, 17.3–26.4) 4.4 (2.9–6.8), p<0.01

aOR: adjusted odds ratio, % percentage, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval