Table 4.
Ordinal questions, agreement and weighted kappa coefficients for total group (N = 409) and comparison between group 1 (n = 183) and group 2 (n = 226)
| Text message: brief content |
Total group |
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No. of pairs |
% agreement |
Cicchetti-Allison and Fleiss-Cohen kappa |
95% CI |
P-value |
No. of pairs |
Cicchetti-Allison and Fleiss-Cohen kappa |
95%CI |
No. of pairs |
Cicchetti-Allison and Fleiss-Cohen kappa |
95% CI |
|
| 9: how much did child drink during diarrhoea |
14 |
85.7 |
0.66, 0.60 |
0.23-1.00, 0.07-1.00 |
<0.001, 0.01† |
8 |
0.53, 0.44 |
0.005-1.00, -0.18-1.00 |
6 |
1.00, 1.00 |
1.00-1.00, 1.00-1.00 |
| 10a: how much did child eat during diarrhoea |
11 |
45.5 |
0.37, 0.37 |
0.05-0.70, -0.08-0.83 |
0.02†, 0.09 |
5 |
0.70 0.83 |
0.34-1.00, 0.58-1.00 |
6 |
0.13, 0.05 |
-0.10-0.36, -0.26-0.36 |
| 10a: how much did child eat during diarrhoea* |
6 |
4/6 agree |
0.64, 0.74 |
0.21-1.00, 0.35-1.00 |
0.03, 0.049† |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| 10: child had been introduced to complementary foods | 12 | 8/12 agree | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
CI – confidence interval
*We excluded children whose caregivers said that they had not been introduced to complementary feeding by either face-to-face interview or text messaging.
†P < 0.05.