Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 12.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Neurobiol. 2016 Sep 21;77(6):708–725. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22448

Table 3.

Summary of Statistical Output for Dendritic Complexity Analyses

Measure Planned RM-ANOVA Interaction Radius Neonatal Treatment Housing Condition Significant Post Hocs (μm)
Dendritic Material SH:AE vs. SI vs. SC *** **** ** N/A AE vs. SI: 90, 110
AE vs. SC: 50, 70, 90, 110, 130
SI vs. SC: 50, 70
SC:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR n.s. **** N/A ** SH vs. WRWR: 90
SI:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR n.s. **** N/A **** SH vs. WREC: 50, 70
SH vs. WRWR: 90
WREC vs. WRWR:50, 70
AE:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR **** **** N/A **** SH vs. WREC: 70, 90, 110, 130
SH vs. WRWR: 70, 90, 110, 130
Intersections per Radius SH:AE vs. SI vs. SC **** **** ** N/A AE vs. SI: 70, 90, 110
AE vs. SC: 30, 50,
70, 90, 110, 130
SI vs. SC: 50, 130
SC:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR n.s. **** N/A * SH vs. WRWR: 90
SI:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR * **** N/A **** SH vs. WREC: 30, 50, 70
WREC vs. WRWR: 30, 50, 70
AE:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR *** **** N/A **** SH vs. WREC: 50, 70, 90, 110
SH vs. WRWR: 50, 70, 90, 110
Bifurcations per Radius SH:AE vs. SI vs. SC n.s. **** ** N/A AE vs. SI: 50, 70
AE vs. SC:30, 50
SC:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR n.s. **** N/A n.s.ˆ SH vs. WREC: 110
SH vs. WRWR: 90
SI:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR n.s. **** N/A n.s.ˆ SH vs. WREC: 110
SH vs. WRWR: 90
AE:SH vs. WREC vs. WRWR n.s. **** N/A **** SH vs. WREC: 70, 90, 110
SH vs. WRWR: 50

Table 3 is complementary to Figures 46. Post hocs refer to radii (μm from the soma) where significant differences were found (p <0.05).

*

p <0.05,

**

p <0.01,

***

p <0.001,

****

p <0.0001,

n.s. =not significant,

ˆ

p <0.01.