Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 Apr 10;18:1185–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.014

Adsorption of cadmium and lead onto live and dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A dataset

Mahnaz Karimpour a, Seyed Davoud Ashrafi a,b, Kamran Taghavi a, Ali Mojtahedi c, Esmaeil Roohbakhsh a, Dariush Naghipour a,
PMCID: PMC5997576  PMID: 29900292

Abstract

In this research heavy metals, Cd and Pb, adsorption efficiency was evaluated in aqueous solutions using live and dead biomass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria. The various important parameters including; pH, temperature, Cd and Pb concentrations, contact time, live and dead cell mass were examined. First, the resistant P. aeruginosa to heavy metals identified and isolated from contaminated soil. Then, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Cd and Pb was determined for P. aeruginosa. The highest adsorption efficiency for Cd and Pb were 87% and 98.5%, under dead cell mass of 125 mg, pH 7, temperature 35 °C and contact time 90 min, respectively. The results of this study showed that P. aeruginosa have a high ability to adsorption of Cd and Pb in aqueous solutions.

Keywords: Adsorption, Lead, Cadmium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa


Specifications Table

Subject area Environmental Engineering
More specific subject area Adsorption process
Type of data Figure and table
How data was acquired Cd and Pb were measured by Atomic adsorption (Varian AA 220).
PH was measured using the digital pH meter (Metrohm).
PCR For final confirmation Pseudomonas aeruginos was done after biochemical tests.
Temperature was measured by digital thermometer, (Testo).
Data format Raw, analyzed.
Experimental factors The effects of various factors including pH, contact time, temperature, heavy metals concentrations and live and dead cell mass concentrations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on adsorption efficiency were investigated in batch system.
Experimental features Different concentrations of live and dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Cd and Pb, different pH, temperature and time, was used and adsorption efficiency was calculated.
Data source location Department of Environmental Health Engineering, school of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Data accessibility The data are available within this paper.

Value of the data

  • The data suggest biological adsorption method to removal of heavy metals from soil and aqueous solution.

  • This data can be used for development of adsorption system for removal of heavy metals from soil, water and wastewater.

  • This data will be useful for the engineers which is associated with biological purification of water, wastewater and soil refinement.

1. Data

Environmental pollutants including heavy metals and organic maters has become an issue of severe international concern in recent years [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. The various process can be used for removal of these pollutants from the environment like adsorption systems [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. The agricultural soil and groundwater of Guilan Province, north Iran, contains high levels of Cd and Pb. In this work Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria isolated from agriculture soil. The various important parameters including; pH, temperature, Cd and Pb concentrations, contact time, live and dead cell mass were examined [14], [15], [16], [17]. The range of Pb and Cd adsorption percentages by using live and dead cell mass of P. aeruginosa are provided in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 at different conditions. The highest adsorption efficiency for Cd and Pb were 87% and 98.5%, under dead cell mass of 125 mg, pH 7, temperature 35 °C and contact time 90 min, respectively. The main effects curve for lead and cadmium adsorption by live and dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aerogenosa were provided by Minitab 15 software and were showed in Fig. 1, Fig. 2.

Table 1.

The range of Pb and Cd adsorption percentages at different pH by using dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (dead cell mass 75 mg, temperature 35 °C, contact time 90 min).

pH Cd (ppm)
Pb (ppm)
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
5 63.9 55.7 47.6 39.7 31.9 75.3 67.1 59.2 51.6 44.1
6 66.0 57.4 49.0 40.7 32.6 77.3 68.8 60.5 52.4 44.5
7 67.7 58.8 50.1 41.5 33.1 79.1 70.2 61.5 53.0 44.7
8 69.0 59.8 50.8 41.9 33.1 80.7 71.3 62.2 53.3 44.6
9 70.0 60.5 51.1 41.9 33.0 81.9 72.2 62.6 53.3 44.2

Table 2.

The range of Pb and Cd adsorption percentages at different temperatures by using dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (dead cell mass 75 mg, pH7, contact time 90 min).

T(OC) Cd(PPM)
Pb(PPM)
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
25 64.9 53.4 42.0 30.8 19.7 76.6 65 53.6 42.4 31.4
30 67.1 56.9 46.9 37.0 27.2 78.7 68.4 58.3 48.5 38.9
35 67.7 58.8 50.1 41.5 33.1 79.1 70.2 61.5 53.0 44.7
40 66.5 59.0 51.6 44.3 37.2 78.0 70.4 63.0 55.9 48.9
45 63.6 52.4 51.3 45.4 39.6 75.2 68.9 62.9 57.1 51.5

Table 3.

The range of Pb and Cd adsorption percentages at different times by using dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (dead cell mass 75 mg, temperature 35 °C, pH7).

Time(min) Cd(PPM)
Pb(PPM)
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
25 40.8 30.9 21.2 13.6 5.1 52.5 42.7 32.9 23.2 14.0
50 52.9 43.4 34.1 24.9 15.9 64.5 54.9 45.5 36.4 27.5
75 62.8 53.7 44.7 35.9 27.3 74.3 65.1 56.2 47.4 38.9
100 70.5 61.7 53.2 44.7 36.5 81.9 73.1 64.6 56.2 48.1
125 75.9 67.5 59.4 51.3 43.4 87.4 79.0 70.8 62.8 55.1
150 79.1 71.1 63.3 55.6 48.1 90.6 82.6 74.8 67.3 59.9

Table 4.

The range of Pb and Cd adsorption percentages at different dead cell mass by using dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (temperature 35 °C, pH7, contact time 90 min).

Dead cell mass(mg) Cd(PPM)
Pb(PPM)
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
30 49.0 38.0 27.1 16.3 5.8 60.7 49.5 38.5 27.7 17.1
50 57.4 47.3 37.5 27.7 18.0 69.0 58.8 48.8 39.0 29.5
70 65.6 56.5 47.6 45.2 30.1 77.1 67.9 59.0 39.8 41.7
90 73.6 66.9 57.5 49.6 41.9 85.1 75.5 68.9 61.2 53.7
110 81.4 74.2 67.2 60.0 55.5 92.9 85.7 78.7 72.0 53.5
125 87.0 80.6 74.3 68.1 62.1 98.5 92.1 86.0 80.0 74.3

Table 5.

The range of Pb and Cd adsorption percentages at different live cell mass by using living cell (temperature 35 °C, pH7, contact time 36 h).

Live cell mass(gr) Cd(PPM)
Pb(PPM)
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
2 44.3 32.2 21.3 11.7 10.5 53.3 41.8 30.9 20.8 11.3
4 53.9 42.7 32.8 24.0 16.5 64.9 54.4 44.6 33.4 27.0
6 64.4 54.1 45.0 37.2 30.6 75.5 66.0 57.2 49.1 41.6
8 75.7 66.3 58.1 51.2 45.5 85.0 76.5 68.7 61.6 55.2
9 81.6 72.7 62.0 58.5 53.3 89.4 81.4 74.1 67.5 61.6

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The main effects curve for cadmium (a) and lead (b) adsorption by dead cell mass of Pseudomonas aerogenosa.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The main effects curve for the percentage of cadmium (a) and lead (b) adsorption by live cell mass of pseudomonas aerogenosa.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

All biological and chemical materials used in the experimental, were provided with degree of purity and purchases has been done Merck Company, Germany.

2.2. Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and experiments

First, the agricultural soil samples from Guilan province were prepared at different dilutions and cultured in the cultivation environments nutrient agar and Mac Conkey agar and for 24 h incubated in the temperature 37 °C and several steps repeated until prepared a pure culture. Further biochemical tests done for recognize that include:

Catalase Test: Use a loop or sterile wooden stick to transfer a small amount of colony growth in the surface of a clean, dry glass slide. Place a drop of 3% H2O2 in the glass slide observe for the evolution of oxygen bubbles.

Lactose test: some of colony was inoculated to tubes contain lactose broth.

Sim test: H2S, indole, Motility was at P. aeruginosa.

Urease test: Rapid urease-positive organisms turn the entire medium pink within 24 h.

TSI test: 0.1% Glucose, 1.0% lactose/1.0% sucrose: Iron, was at P. aeruginosa.

Gram staining: Negative gram.

This bacteria in the cultivation environment MHA produced blue pigment.

For final approval isolated bacteria used from PCR method with characteristics down:

Characteristics of primers were presented for P. aeruginosa in Table 6. Also the FTIR of the live and dead cell mass was prepared and presented in Fig. 3.

Table 6.

Primers sequences used to detect 16SrRNA Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

PCR method Primer(5′ to 3′) Anneal temperature (°C) DNA target Accession in gen Bank
Forward GGGGGATCTTCGGACCTCA 58 16SrRNA AB091760.1
Reverse TCCTTAGAGTGCCCACCCG

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The FTIR of live (a) and dead (b) cell mass of pseudomonas aerogenosa.

For live cell mass preparing, after separating the bacteria from the soil, microorganism cultured in Erlenmeyer contain 100 ml lactose broth, incubated for 24 h at temperature 35 °C, 200 rpm. Then, it was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 20 min and upper liquid was removed and the separated microorganism was used for adsorption process. For dead cell mass preparing, microorganism cultured in Erlenmeyer contain 100 ml lactose broth, incubated for 24 h at temperature 35 °C, 200 rpm. Then it was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 20 min and upper liquid was removed and the residual of it dried at 60 °C. To study of the adsorption process, live and dead cell mass was used in the batch system (250 ml Erlenmeyer), in different conditions (pH 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and temperature 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 °C and Cd and Pb concentrations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mg/L and contact time 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 min for dead cell mass and 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 h for live dead mass). The data of heavy metals concentration in adsorption process were collected and the efficiency percent of adsorption was calculated by following equation;

R(%)=100×C0CtC0

where c0 and ct are the concentrations of the primary and secondary heavy metals, respectively. Data analysis was performed using Minitab 15 software.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the staff of Shaft Health Center of Guilan University of medical Sciences.

Acknowledgments

Funding sources

This paper was a part of master science dissertation of the first author that has been registered in Ethics Committee under ID no; IR.GUMS.REC.1396.169 and supported financially by a grant (96040301) from the Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.014.

Transparency document. Supporting information

mmc1

Supplementary Fig. S1.

References

  • 1.Ahmadi M., Kouhgardi E., Ramavandi B. Physico-chemical study of dew melon peel biochar for chromium attenuation from simulated and actual wastewaters. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016;33:2589–2601. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ramavandi B., Rahbar A., Sahebi S. Effective removal of Hg2+ from aqueous solutions and seawater by Malva sylvestris. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016;57:23814–23826. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Foroutan R., SKhoo F., Ramavandi B., Abbasi S. Heavy metals removal from synthetic and shipyard wastewater using Phoenix dactylifera activated carbon. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017;82:146–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ramavand B. Adsorption potential of NH4Br-soaked activated carbon for cyanide removal from wastewater. Indian J. Chem. Technol. (IJCT) 2016;22:1183–1193. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Naghipour D., Jaafari J., Ashrafi S.D., Mahvi A.H. Remediation of heavy metals contaminated silty clay loam soil by column extraction with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and nitrilotriacetic Acid. J. Environ. Eng. 2017;143 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kamani H., Mahvi A.H., Seyedsalehi M., Jaafari J., Hoseini M., Safari G.H., Dalvand A., Aslani H., Mirzaei N., Ashrafi S.D. Contamination and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in street dust of Tehran, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;14:2675–2682. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yousefi N., Fatehizedeh A., Ghadiri K., Mirzaei N., Ashrafi S.D., Mahvi A.H. Application of nanofilter in removal of phosphate, fluoride and nitrite from groundwater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016;57:11782–11788. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kamani H., Bazrafshan E., Ashrafi S.D., Sancholi F. Efficiency of Sono-nano-catalytic process of Tio2 nano-particle in removal of erythromycin and metronidazole from aqueous solution. J.-Mazandaran-Univ.-Med.-Sci. 2017;27:140–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ashrafi S.D., Nasseri S., Alimohammadi M., Mahvi A.H., Faramarzi M.A. Optimization of the enzymatic elimination of flumequine by laccase-mediated system using response surface methodology. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016;57:14478–14487. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hosseinipour Dizgah S., Taghavi K., Jaafari J., Roohbakhsh E., Ashrafi S.D. Data on pollutants content in the influent and effluent from wastewater treatment plant of Rasht in Guilan Province, Iran. Data Brief. 2018;16:271–275. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Naghipour D., Ashrafi S.D., Mojtahedi A., Vatandoost M., Hosseinzadeh L., Roohbakhsh E. Data on microbial and physiochemical characteristics of inlet and outlet water from household water treatment devices in Rasht, Iran. Data Brief. 2018;16:1005–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.12.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ashrafi S.D., Kamani H., Jaafari J., Mahvi A.H. Experimental design and response surface modeling for optimization of fluoroquinolone removal from aqueous solution by NaOH-modified rice husk. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016;57:16456–16465. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ashrafi S.D., Kamani H., SoheilArezomand H., Yousefi N., Mahvi A.H. Optimization and modeling of process variables for adsorption of Basic Blue 41 on NaOH-modified rice husk using response surface methodology. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016;57:14051–14059. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ashrafi S.D., Kamani H., Mahvi A.H. The optimization study of direct red 81 and methylene blue adsorption on NaOH-modified rice husk. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016;57:738–746. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kefala M.I., Zouboulis A.I., Matis K.A. Biosorption of cadmium ions by actinomycetes and separation by flotation. Environ. Pollut. 2010;104:283–293. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sinha S., Kumar S.S., Mukherjee S.K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa KUCD1 A possible candidate for cadmium bioremediation. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2009;40:655–662. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220090003000030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dixit R., Malaviya D., Pandiyan K., Singh U.B., Sahu A., Shukla R. Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: an overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability. 2007;7:2189–2212. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES