Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;7(1):49–73. doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0131-0

Table 1.

Study characteristics of RCT studies with MIGS devices

Study Study design IOP-lowering intervention (n) Subgroup Intervention Mean baseline IOP (mmHg; ± SD) Country Longest follow-up
iStent®
 Craven et al. [33] Prospective, multicenter MIGS (n = 98) iStent Single trabecular micro-bypass stent with concomitant cataract surgery 25.4 ± 3.6 USA 24 months
Cataract surgery alone (n = 101) Phacoemulsification Cataract surgery 25.2 ± 3.6
 Fea et al. [31] Prospective, double-masked Cataract surgery with MIGS (n = 12) iStent Phacoemulsification with iStent® implantation (combined group) 17.9 ± 2.6 Italy 15 months
Cataract surgery (n = 24) Phacoemulsification Phacoemulsification alone (control group) 17.3 ± 3.0
 Fea et al. [34] Prospective unmasked randomized evaluation MIGS (n = 94) iStent (inject) × 2  stents iStent® inject device 25.2 ± 1.4 Italy, Spain, Poland, Germany, UK, and Armenia 12 months
Medication (n = 98) Meds fixed combination of latanoprost/timolol Two medications 24.8 ± 1.7
 Fea et al. [35] Prospective MIGS (n = 10) iStent micro-bypass iStent® implantation and cataract surgery (combined group) 17.8 ± 2.7 Italy 48 months
Cataract surgery alone (n = 14) Phacoemulsification Cataract surgery alone (control group) 16.7 ± 3.0
 Fernández-Barrientos et al. [32] Prospective Cataract surgery with MIGS (n = 17) iStent × 2 iStents and cataract surgery 24.2 ± 1.8 Spain 12 months
Cataract surgery alone (n = 16) Phacoemulsification Cataract surgery alone 23.6 ± 1.5
 Katz et al. [36] Prospective MIGS (n = 38) iStent × 1 One trabecular microbypass stent 19.8 ± 1.3 USA 18 months
MIGS (n = 41) iStent × 2 Two stents 20.1 ± 1.6
MIGS (n = 40) iStent × 3 Three stents 20.4 ± 1.8
 Vold et al. [37] Cohort study MIGS (n = 54) iStent × 2 Two trabecular bypass stents 25.5 ± 2.5 Armenia 36 months
Medication (n = 47) Topical travoprost Topical travoprost 25.1 ± 4.6
Hydrus® Micro-Stent
 Pfeiffer et al. [38] Prospective, multicenter, single-masked Cataract surgery with MIGS (n = 50) Hydrus Micro-Stent plus Phacoemulsification Hydrus Micro-Stent and cataract surgery group 18.9 ± 3.3 Germany, Spain, Netherlands, and Italy 24 months
Cataract surgery alone (n = 50) Phacoemulsification Cataract surgery group 18.6 ± 3.8
CyPass® Micro-Stent
 Vold et al. [39] Prospective, multicenter MIGS (n = 54) CyPass Micro-Stent Micro-stent implantation via an ab interno approach 26.3 ± 4.4 USA 24 months
Cataract surgery (n = 47) Phacoemulsification Phacoemulsification alone (control group) 26.6 ± 4.2