Table 3.
DV | Coefficient (β) | Estimate (SE) | t-value | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Money trusted | Intercept | 0.90 (0.11) | 8.18 | <0.001*** |
Ambiguity attitude | −0.04 (0.11) | −0.33 | 0.74 | |
Untrustworthy | −0.22 (0.07) | −3.12 | 0.001** | |
Trustworthy | 0.36 (0.10) | 3.76 | <0.001*** | |
Ambiguity attitude × untrustworthy | 0.12 (0.07) | 1.79 | 0.07† | |
Ambiguity attitude × trustworthy | 0.07 (0.09) | 0.68 | 0.49 | |
Untrustworthy × ambiguity level | −0.13 (0.09) | −1.32 | 0.18 | |
Trustworthy × ambiguity level | 0.43 (0.10) | 4.13 | <0.001*** | |
Untrustworthy × ambiguity attitude × ambiguity level | 0.02 (0.09) | 0.21 | 0.83 | |
Trustworthy × ambiguity attitude × ambiguity level | 0.04 (0.11) | 0.36 | 0.72 |
Money trustedi,t = β0 + β1 ambiguity attitudei × β2 type of trusteei,t + β3 ambiguity leveli,t × type of trusteei,t + β4 ambiguity attitudei × ambiguity leveli,t × type of trusteei,t + ε
Where ambiguity attitude is indexed by subject (i), type of trustee is a categorical variable, and ambiguity level is an indicator variable. Ambiguity attitudes were inverted and standardized before being entered into the regression. Ambiguity level is coded as ambiguous (0) and unambiguous (1) trustees; AIC = 10,275
†p < 0.1; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001