Table 1.
Estimates of the genetic parameters and the goodness-of-fit-measures obtained via MET analyses (model [1]) for WW and WS conditions, including additive (model A) and additive-dominance (model AD) effects
| WS | WW | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | AD | A | AD | ||
| GY | h 2 | 0.40 (0.02) | 0.20 (0.03) | 0.45 (0.03) | 0.28 (0.03) |
| d 2 | – | 0.14 (0.02) | – | 0.20 (0.02) | |
| H 2 | – | 0.34 (0.03) | – | 0.48 (0.02) | |
| LogL | −2332.79 | −2237.95 | −1661.97 | −1611.48 | |
| AIC | 4697.58 | 4531.90 | 3355.94 | 3278.95 | |
| EPP | h 2 | 0.33 (0.02) | 0.24 (0.02) | 0.23 (0.02) | 0.22 (0.03) |
| d 2 | – | 0.12 (0.01) | – | 0.07 (0.03) | |
| H 2 | – | 0.35 (0.02) | – | 0.29 (0.03) | |
| LogL | −5082.60 | −5042.37 | −2718.68 | −2707.91 | |
| AIC | 10197.22 | 10140.73 | 5469.37 | 5471.82 | |
| ASI | h 2 | 0.30 (0.06) | 0.25 (0.06) | 0.50 (0.03) | 0.49 (0.03) |
| d 2 | – | 0.10 (0.02) | – | 0.04 (0.02) | |
| H 2 | – | 0.35 (0.05) | – | 0.53 (0.03) | |
| LogL | −3455.46 | −3428.31 | −678.13 | −669.34 | |
| AIC | 6942.87 | 6912.62 | 1388.26 | 1394.69 | |
| FFT | h 2 | 0.44 (0.02) | 0.31 (0.03) | 0.49 (0.03) | 0.43 (0.03) |
| d 2 | – | 0.09 (0.04) | – | 0.08 (0.02) | |
| H 2 | – | 0.40 (0.04) | – | 0.51 (0.03) | |
| LogL | −4824.27 | −4775.49 | −2298.95 | −2277.53 | |
| AIC | 9681.13 | 9606.98 | 4629.91 | 4611.06 | |
| MFT | h 2 | 0.58 (0.02) | 0.44 (0.03) | 0.48 (0.03) | 0.41 (0.03) |
| d 2 | – | 0.07 (0.01) | – | 0.08 (0.02) | |
| H 2 | – | 0.51 (0.02) | – | 0.49 (0.03) | |
| LogL | −3567.26 | −3538.55 | −2112.20 | −2089.74 | |
| AIC | 7166.52 | 7133.11 | 4256.40 | 4235.47 | |
h2 narrow-sense heritability, d2 proportion of the total genetic variance explained by the dominance effects, H2 broad-sense heritability, LogL REML log-likelihood of the fitted model. Traits correspond to grain yield (GY, t/ha), number of ears per plot (EPP), anthesis-silking interval (ASI, days), female flowering time (FFT, days), and male flowering time (MFT, days)
Values within parentheses are approximated standard errors