Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):774–780. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0743

Table 3.

Association between surgical repair versus no surgical repair and pain, restraint use, pressure ulcer, and antipsychotic use in NH residents with advanced dementia and hip fracture who survived 6-months with valid MDS assessment (n=1,794)

Surgical repair
n=1,603
No surgical
repair
n=191
Unadjusted
OR
(95% CI)
Adjusted ORb
(95% CI)
IPTW modelb
(95% CI)
Pain 465 (29.0) 59 (30.9) 0.91 (0.66, 1.27) 0.89 (0.63, 1.26) 0.78 (0.61, 0.99)
Antipsychotica use 529 (29.5) 44 (20.4) 1.64 (1.16, 2.32) 1.43 (0.93, 2.19) 1.02 (0.76, 1.37)
Restraint use 233 (13.0) 24 (11.1) 1.18 (0.75, 1.85) 1.44 (0.86, 2.40) 1.83 (1.21, 2.76)
Pressure ulcer 200 (11.2) 41 (19.0) 0.52 (0.36, 0.76) 0.68 (0.45, 1.03) 0.64 (0.47, 0.86)
a

Among 2,007 residents who survived six months following the hip fracture

b

Adjusted for ADEPT score, race, and cognitive performance scale (CPS). Each model is also adjusted for pre-fracture status of the examined outcome, i.e., models examining pain, restraint, pressure ulcer and antipsychotic as outcomes were adjusted for pre fracture pain, restraint use, pressure ulcer, or antipsychotic use, respectively