Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 13;8:9049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27177-8

Figure 4.

Figure 4

AUC among m-NGSG, HMMER and PSI-BLAST with best scoring MCC value. The left panel indicates the receiver operating characteristics of m-NGSG-based models. The right panel indicates the comparison of AUC among m-NGSG, PSI-BLAST, and HMMER for the corresponding function-based model. The height of each bar represents the AUC for each method. m-NGSG-based models demonstrates better AUC than PSI-BLAST and HMMER.