Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5349–5352. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944834

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Relationship between mean detection threshold (μf, x-axis) and variability of the detection threshold (σf, y-axis). NI control subject data (pink squares) were used to determine confidence interval bounds for intact proprioception (contours). The 99.9% CI bound is shown in black. Five SS(−) (maroon circles) had a combination of thresholds and variability that put them outside the bounds of the 99.9 % CI. Two SS(+) had a combination of thresholds and variability that put them inside the 99.9 % CI (maroon triangles).