TABLE 2.
Effect of quinoa on body composition in overweight and obese participants at 6 and 12 wk of intervention1
Body-composition characteristics | Control | 25 g/d | 50 g/d | P (treatment)2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 wk | 12 wk | 6 wk | 12 wk | 6 wk | 12 wk | ||
BMI, kg/m2 | 28.45 ± 0.72 | 29.85 ± 1.19 | 33.45 ± 1.38 | 32.81 ± 1.43 | 30.86 ± 1.11 | 30.20 ± 1.16 | 0.968 |
Body weight, kg | 78.43 ± 2.80 | 81.62 ± 4.31 | 90.34 ± 4.19 | 89.02 ± 4.24 | 86.05 ± 2.80 | 84.59 ± 2.83 | 0.775 |
Body fat, % | 39.47 ± 2.0 | 40.29 ± 1.99 | 41.28 ± 1.73 | 41.41 ± 1.93 | 40.96 ± 1.71 | 40.25 ± 1.87 | 0.380 |
Total lean tissue, % | 61.86 ± 2.29 | 61.09 ± 2.31 | 59.85 ± 1.98 | 59.74 ± 2.15 | 59.04 ± 1.71 | 59.75 ± 1.86 | 0.341 |
Bone mineral density, g/cm2 | 1.87 ± 0.11 | 2.42 ± 0.13 | 1.95 ± 0.09 | 2.44 ± 0.11 | 1.84 ± 0.08 | 2.49 ± 0.10 | 0.477 |
Waist circumference, cm | 100.15 ± 3.62 | 103.26 ± 3.62 | 109.88 ± 3.61 | 108.86 ± 3.54 | 106.34 ± 2.20 | 105.03 ± 2.07 | 0.265 |
Values are means ± SEMs.
Indicates the main effect of treatment observed between groups (baseline adjusted on the basis of a linear mixed model).