Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Nutr. 2018 Mar;119(6):685–694. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517003993

Table 2.

Difference (£/day) in dietary cost by Mediterranean diet adherence in the Fenland Study (n=12,417).*

Mediterranean diet score based on dietary pyramid (0-15) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Adjusted means of dietary cost, £/day (95% CI)
Low (3.3-8.4) Reference Reference Reference 4.26 (4.23, 4.29)
Medium (8.4-9.6) 0.18 (0.14, 0.22) 0.15 (0.11, 0.19) 0.16 (0.12, 0.20) 4.42 (4.39, 4.45)
High (9.6-14.0) 0.24 (0.20, 0.28) 0.19 (0.15, 0.24) 0.20 (0.16, 0.24) 4.47 (4.44, 4.49)
    p-trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Per SD difference 0.11 (0.09, 0.13) 0.09 (0.07, 0.11) 0.10 (0.08, 0.11)
*

Daily dietary cost and dietary intake adjusted to a 2000 kcal/day diet using the residual method. Estimates shown are β coefficients from linear regression estimated based on 10 multiple imputations.

Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 is additionally adjusted for test site, education level, occupation, household income, marital status; Model 3 is additionally adjusted for BMI, objectively measured physical activity (energy expenditure) and smoking status. Adjusted means of dietary cost estimated based on model 3 and on single imputed dataset, after confirming no difference in beta coefficients between single and multiple (10) imputations.