Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2014 Feb 8;121(6):1212–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.016

Table 4.

Final Step of Logistic Regression Analysis Using Stepwise Backward Elimination for Component Model and Individual Item Model: Compliance with Annual Diabetic Eye Exams Survey 2013

Model Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P Value
Component model
 Years diagnosed with diabetes 1.06 (1.01–1.12) 0.01
 Hemoglobin A1c 0.81 (0.68–0.96) 0.01
 Insurance coverage (0 ¼ no insurance; 1 ¼ insured) 2.23 (1.15–4.33) 0.02
 Component 3 score (barriers) 0.90 (0.82–0.99) 0.03
Individual item model
 Years diagnosed with diabetes 1.08 (1.02–1.14) 0.01
 Hemoglobin A1c 0.79 (0.65–0.95) 0.01
 Insurance coverage (0 ¼ no insurance; 1 ¼ insured) -- --
 There are many things that make it hard to get an eye examination each year (Ba) 0.60 (0.42–0.84) <0.01
 Diabetic eye disease can be seen with an eye examination (Be) -- --
 My insurance covers most of the cost of an eye examination (Ba) 1.41 (1.06–1.86) 0.02
 Getting an eye examination every year is not one of my top priorities (O) -- --

Ba = barriers; Be = benefits; C = cues to action; E = self-efficacy; O = other; Se = severity; Su = susceptibility.