Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biling (Camb Engl). 2017 Dec 26;21(3):479–488. doi: 10.1017/S1366728917000694

Table 3.

Stimuli characteristics by frequency used in the picture naming task.

Variable Low Frequency High Frequency p-value
Freq1 subtlex 247 (123) 5477 (6537) p < .001
Freq2 CELEX 2.0 (0.8) 4.3 (1.1) p < .001
AoA 5.3 (1.2) 4.5 (1.1) p < .001
Syllables 1.6 (0.7) 1.5 (0.6) p = .35
Letters 5.4 (1.7) 5.1 (1.2) p = .19
Name agreement 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) p = .60
Visual complexity 16048 (7144) 18083 (9640) p = .17
Imageability (100–700) 589 (32) 596 (34) p = .25
Number of phonemes 4.3 (1.4) 4.0 (1.1) p = .15
Initial phoneme (1=Plosive/2=Non-plosive) 1.6 (.5) 1.6 (.5) p = .38

Note. Freq1 subtlex: The frequency of the word as noun in Brysbaert and New (2009); Brysbaert et al. (2012).

Freq2 CELEX: Natural logarithm of the Celex frequency, as reported in the original IPNP database.

AoA: Age-of-acquisition ratings in Kuperman, Stadthagen-Gonzalez, and Brysbaert (2012).

Name Agreement: Percent name agreement, as reported in the original IPNP database.

Visual Complexity: Estimates of objective visual complexity, as reported in the original IPNP database.

Imageability Rating: As reported in the MRC Psycholinguistic Database.