Table 1.
Integrated landscape-level initiatives emanating from sectorial approaches |
---|
Forest and landscape restoration |
1. Integrated forest and water management, Sweden (Eriksson et al. 2018) |
2. Forest restoration, China (Long et al. 2018) |
3. Reforestation through co-management (MTS), Ghana (Foli et al. 2018) |
Natural resource management schemes |
4. Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Dale et al. 2018) |
5. Community resource management (CREMA), Ghana (Foli et al. 2018) |
6. Chantier d’Aménagment Forestier (CAF), Burkina Faso (Foli et al. 2018) |
Climate change mitigation |
7. REDD+, Peru (Rodríguez-Ward et al. 2018) |
8. REDD+, Cameroon (Brown 2018) |
Sustainable value chain governance |
9. Value chain governance for environmental services, The Netherlands (Ingram et al. 2018) |
10. Value chain collaboration, Ghana (Deans et al. 2018) |
11. Oil palm public–private partnership, Indonesia (van Oosten et al. 2018) |
aThe papers by Lowore et al. (2018) and Ndeinoma et al. (2018) are excluded from this overview as they deal with “win–win” strategies based on the trade of non-timber forest products, without targeting the landscape level. Kusters et al. (2018) is excluded from this table as the paper refers to a method designed for integrated landscape approaches from the beginning
MTS modified taungya system, CREMA community resource management area, CAF Chantier d’Aménagement Forestier, REDD+ reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation