Skip to main content
. 2018 May 30;62(1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1055-0

Table 1.

Overview of integrated landscape-level initiatives (ILLIs) analyzed in this issuea

Integrated landscape-level initiatives emanating from sectorial approaches
Forest and landscape restoration
1. Integrated forest and water management, Sweden (Eriksson et al. 2018)
2. Forest restoration, China (Long et al. 2018)
3. Reforestation through co-management (MTS), Ghana (Foli et al. 2018)
Natural resource management schemes
4. Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Dale et al. 2018)
5. Community resource management (CREMA), Ghana (Foli et al. 2018)
6. Chantier d’Aménagment Forestier (CAF), Burkina Faso (Foli et al. 2018)
Climate change mitigation
7. REDD+, Peru (Rodríguez-Ward et al. 2018)
8. REDD+, Cameroon (Brown 2018)
Sustainable value chain governance
9. Value chain governance for environmental services, The Netherlands (Ingram et al. 2018)
10. Value chain collaboration, Ghana (Deans et al. 2018)
11. Oil palm public–private partnership, Indonesia (van Oosten et al. 2018)

aThe papers by Lowore et al. (2018) and Ndeinoma et al. (2018) are excluded from this overview as they deal with “win–win” strategies based on the trade of non-timber forest products, without targeting the landscape level. Kusters et al. (2018) is excluded from this table as the paper refers to a method designed for integrated landscape approaches from the beginning

MTS modified taungya system, CREMA community resource management area, CAF Chantier d’Aménagement Forestier, REDD+ reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation