Table A3.

Significant intrapersonal moderators of the association between the perceived neighborhood environment with objective daily walking & vehicle time (N= 418 days, n=72 participants)

	Walking Timea
	Rate Ratio 95% CI		p-value
≥$2,000 (Household Income)	1.96	(1.16 – 3.32)	0.012
High-acculturationb	0.88	(0.56 – 1.38)	0.578
Access to destinations	1.88	(1.03 – 3.46)	0.041
Safety from traffic	0.98	(0.80 – 1.20)	0.848
Safety from crime	1.26	(1.03 – 1.54)	0.024
Sidewalk maintenance	0.65	(0.50 – 0.85)	0.002
Aesthetics	1.14	(0.93 – 1.39)	0.207
Access to destinations X household income (<$2,000 vs. ≥$2,000 (reference))	4.67	(1.58 – 13.78)	0.005
Sidewalk maintenance X acculturationc (high vs. low(reference))	0.53	(0.32 – 0.88)	0.014
	Vehicle Timea
≥ High school education	1.28	(1.05 – 1.55)	0.015
Overweight or obese	2.39	(1.66 – 3.46)	0.000
Access to destinations	2.03	(1.39 – 2.96)	0.000
Safety from traffic	0.92	(0.83 – 1.02)	0.117
Safety from crime	0.93	(0.84 – 1.04)	0.205
Sidewalk maintenance	0.98	(0.89 – 1.09)	0.765
Aesthetics	1.09	(0.97 – 1.22)	0.145
Access to destinations X weight status (overweight/obese vs. normal (reference))	0.24	(0.12 – 0.51)	0.000
Safety from crime X high school education(≥ degree vs. < degree(reference))	0.76	(0.62 – 0.95)	0.013

Notes: bold indicates a significant association at p<0.05

^aEstimates are from a generalized linear mixed model, adjusted for participant clustering effects, with negative binomial error distributions. Models are controlled for age, church, and total wear time..

^ba mean score of ≥ 2.5 on the BAS Scale for the non-Hispanic domain