Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Feb 22;235(5):1371–1387. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4848-1

Fig. 2. synGLT-1 KO mice showed no abnormalities in gate or rotorod performance.

Fig. 2

Digigate analysis revealed no differences between synGLT-1 KO (N=17) and WT littermate controls (N=16) in stride duration (a) or stride length (b) (speed of the treadmill=20cm/s). No motor deficit on rotarod (c) was found in synGLT-1 KO mice (N=26; closed circles) compared to WT mice (N=23; open circles). Error bars indicate SEM