Table 2.
Summary of reviewed studies addressing detection of adverse glycemic events: prediction horizon (PH) in minutes, objective population criteria, number of participants in the cohort, mean number of monitored days per patient, mean number of monitored hours per day, type of monitoring technology, existence of monitoring during the overnight period (O), and inclusion of exercise or physical activity information (E),
| PH (min) | Population | Cohort | Days | Time | Measurements | O | E | Method | Refa | Year | |
| 0 min | T1Db | 6 | 1 day | 10 h | EEGc | ✓ | ANNd | [65] | 2010 | ||
| 0 min | T1D | 30 | 80-247 days | — | SMBGe | ✓ | RFf, SVMg | [66] | 2012 | ||
| 0 min | T1D | 15 | 1 day | 10 h | CGMh | ✓ | ANN, PSOi | [67] | 2012 | ||
| 0 min | T1D | 10 | 30 days | 4 h | CGM | SVM | [68] | 2013 | |||
| 30, 60 min | T1D | 15 | 12.5 days | 24 h | CGM | ✓ | ✓ | SVM | [69] | 2013 | |
| 0 min | T1D | 10 | 4.5 days | 6 h | CGM | SVM | [70] | 2013 |
|
||
| 30 min | T1D | 10 | 17.3 days | 24 h | CGM | ✓ | DTj | [71] | 2013 | ||
| 24 h | T2Dk | 163 | —l | —l | SMBG | RF | [72] | 2015 | |||
| 0 min | T1D | 15 | 1 day | 4 h | CGM | ANN | [73] | 2014 | |||
| 0 min | T1D | 10 | —m | —m | SMBG, ECG | ✓ | ANN | [74] | 2014 | ||
| 2, 7, 30, 61-90 days | T1D, T2D | 201, 323 | —n | —n | SMBG | Pattern recognition | [75] | 2014 | |||
| 0 min | T1D | 15 | 1 day | 10 h | ECG | ✓ | ✓ | ANN | [76] | 2016 | |
| Past events | T2D | 119695 | >12 days | — | EHRo | NLPp | [77] | 2016 | |||
| 0 min | T1D, T2D | 500 | 1 day | 2 h | SMBG | DT, ANN | [78] | 2017 |
aRef: reference.
bT1D: type 1 diabetes.
cEEG: electroencephalogram.
dANN: artificial neural network.
eSMBG: self-monitoring blood glucose.
fRF: random forest.
gSVM: support vector machine.
hCGM: continuous glucose monitoring.
iPSO: particle swarm optimization.
jDT: decision tree.
kT2D: type 2 diabetes.
l344 data points.
m18 data points.
n787 data points.
oEHR: electronic health record.
pNLP: natural language processing.