Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Chin J Sociol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):56–73. doi: 10.1177/2057150X16685499

Table 2.

Endogenous Switching regression for Transfer, sons

Selection into coresiding Coresiding Not Coresiding

b SE b SE b SE
Parents’ Resources
Father’s SEI .005* .003 −.017* .009 .002 .069
Parents’ survival status
 Both alive (omitted)
 Only one parent alive .144 .096 .439 .330 .530** .252
Respondent having siblings
 Yes (omitted)
 No .709*** .245 −.343 .708 019 .764
Respondent’s Resources
Income in 1998 (logged) −.046 .037 .337*** .128 .073 .104
Education −.035* .020 .161** .071 .028 .050
SEI −.009*** .003 .029** .013 −.009 .009
Other Controls
Parents’ average age .234*** .007 −.074*** .028 .065*** .021
Respondent’s age −.069*** .009 .178*** .030 −.058** .025
City
Shanghai (omitted)
Wuhan .660** .287
Xi’an .840** .297
Length of stay .035*** .007
Wuhan* length of stay −.017** .007
Xi’an* length of stay −.021*** .007
Sigma 3.250*** 2.884***
Rho(1,3)/(2,3) −.930*** .901***

Note:

*

, <0.1;

**

, <0.05;

***

<0.01.

N=1,776. Dummy variables representing missing for father’s SEI, respondent’s SEI, and parents’ age are also included in the models.