Table 3.

Endogenous Switching regression for Transfer, daughters

	Selection into coresiding		Coresiding		Not Coresiding
	b	SE	b	SE	b	SE
Parents’ Resources
Father’s SEI	.004	.003	−.013	.010	−.007	.004
Parents’ survival status
Both alive (omitted)
Only one parent alive	.258**	.117	.145	.393	.452***	.163
Respondent having siblings
Yes (omitted)
No	.620***	.197	−.396	.538	−.663*	.378
Respondent’s Resources
Income in 1998 (logged)	−.021	.038	−.039	.115	.127**	.057
Education	.038	.024	−.015	.076	.017	.030
SEI	−.001	.004	.030**	.014	.011*	.006
Other Controls
Parents’ average age	.022**	.009	−.007	.031	−.006	.014
Respondent’s age	−.036***	.011	−.012	.032	−.011	.015
City
Shanghai (omitted)
Wuhan	−.010	.421
Xi’an	.179	.394
Length of stay	.020**	.008
Wuhan* length of stay	.001	.011
Xi’an* length of stay	−.008	.010
Sigma			1.827***		2.041***
Rho(1,3)/(2,3)			−.188		.735***

Note:

^*, <0.1;

^**, <0.05;

^***<0.01.

N=1,776. Dummy variables representing missing for father’s SEI, respondent’s SEI, and parents’ age are also included in the models.