Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;141(Suppl Suppl 1):48–54. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12466

Table 4.

Diagnostic validity of WHODAS‐12 using WHODAS‐36 as a “gold standard” to determine dysfunction and disability among women in the postpartum period

P>90 P>95 P>97.5
Sensitivity 83.3% 83.3% 66.7%
Specificity 98.3% 99.2% 99.2%
Positive predictive value 83.3% 83.3% 66.67%
Negative predictive value 98.3% 99.2% 99.2%
AUC ROC 0.976 0.996 0.989
Number of women scoring in each category
Percentiles WHODAS‐36 as “gold standard”
P>90 P≤90
WHODAS‐12 as test P>90 10 2
P≤90 2 113
Total 12 115
P>95 P≤95
WHODAS‐12 as test P>95 5 1
P≤95 1 120
Total 6 121
P>97.5 P≤97.5
WHODAS‐12 as test P>97.5 2 1
P≤97.5 1 123
Total 3 124

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; P, percentile; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.