Table 6.
Effects of familiarity on performance at the Environmental Sounds Task
| All groups (SA, SD, DYS) | SA, DYS | SA, SD | DYS, SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Familiarity | W = 21.768, p < .001 | W = 3.911, p = .048 | W = 13.915, p < .001 | W = 13.016, p < .001 |
| Group | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Familiarity × group | W = 36.722, p < .001 | W = 16.170, p < .001 | W = 30.205, p < .001 | n.s. |
| Item | W = 289.778, p < .001 | W = 227.280, p < .001 | W = 213.823, p < .001 | W = 181.217, p < .001 |
| Patient ID | W = 220.781, p < .001 | W = 97.615, p < .001 | W = 203.730, p < .001 | W = 144.581, p < .001 |
| Task | W = 211.108, p < .001 | W = 160.721, p < .001 | W = 112.467, p < .001 | W = 157.033, p < .001 |
n.s. = not significant.
Logistic regression of Environmental Sounds Tasks: sound–picture matching and word–picture matching (Bozeat et al., 2000). Variables entered into the model: familiarity, group, familiarity x group, item, patient ID, and task. p values reported if p < .1.