Table 1. . Targeted therapies in high-grade gliomas.
Study | Year | Setting | N | Design | Findings | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGF inhibition | ||||||
Rich et al. | 2004 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 57 | Phase II trial Gefitinib 500–1000-mg daily |
ORR: 0% PFS-6: 13% |
[60] |
Neyns et al. | 2009 | Recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma | 55 | Phase II trial Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly |
ORR: 6% PFS-6: 9% |
[61] |
van den Bent et al. | 2009 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 110 | Phase II trial 1. Erlotinib 150–200-mg daily 2. Temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 D1–5 q4w or carmustine 60–80 mg/m2 D1–3 q8w |
ORR: 4 vs 10% PFS-6: 11 vs 24% |
[62] |
Li et al. | 2010 | Newly diagnosed glioblastoma | 192 | Phase II trial Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy + mAb 425 |
mOS: 15.7 m | [63] |
Peereboom et al. | 2013 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 56 | Phase II trial Erlotinib 150 mg daily + sorafenib 400 mg twice-daily |
ORR: 5% PFS-6: 14% |
[64] |
Reardon et al. | 2015 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 119 | Phase II trial 1. Afatinib 40 mg daily + temozolomide 75 mg/m2 D1–21 q4w 2. Afatinib 40 mg daily 3. Temozolomide 75 mg/m2 D1–21 q4w |
ORR: 14 vs 14 vs 21% PFS-6: 10 vs 3 vs 23% |
[65] |
Westphal et al. | 2015 | Newly diagnosed glioblastoma | 149 | Phase III trial 1. Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy + nimotuzumab 2. Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy |
mPFS: 7.7 vs 5.8 m mOS: 22.3 vs 19.6 m |
[66] |
EGF antibody drug conjugate | ||||||
Gan et al. (abstract) | 2014 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 12 | Phase I trial ABT-414 |
ORR: 33% | [67] |
Reardon et al. | 2016 | Newly diagnosed glioblastoma | 45 | Phase I trial Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy + ABT-414 |
mPFS: 6.1 m mOS: not reached |
[68] |
EGF peptide vaccine | ||||||
Schuster et al. | 2015 | Newly diagnosed glioblastoma expressing EGFRvIII | 65 | Phase II trial Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy + rindopepimut |
mPFS: 9.2 m mOS: 21.8 m |
[54] |
Reardon et al. (abstract) | 2015 | Recurrent glioblastoma expressing EGFRvIII | 72 | Phase II trial 1. Rindopepimut + bevacizumab 2. Bevacizumab |
ORR: 24 vs 17% PFS-6: 27 vs 11% mOS: 12.0 vs 8.8 m |
[56] |
Weller et al. (abstract) | 2016 | Newly diagnosed glioblastoma expressing EGFRvIII | 745 | Phase III trial 1. Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy + rindopepimut 2. Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy |
Minimal residual disease mOS: 20.1 vs 20.0 m Nonminimal residual disease mOS: 14.8 vs 14.1 m |
[55] |
VEGF inhibition | ||||||
Batchelor et al. | 2010 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 31 | Phase II trial Cediranib 45-mg daily |
ORR: 27% PFS-6: 26% |
[69] |
Iwamoto et al. | 2010 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 35 | Phase II trial Pazopanib 800-mg daily |
ORR: 6% PFS-6: 3% |
[70] |
de Groot et al. | 2011 | Recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma | 58 | Phase II trial Aflibercept 4 mg/kg q2w |
Glioblastoma ORR: 18% PFS-6: 8% Anaplastic glioma ORR: 44% PFS-6: 25% |
[71] |
Pan et al. | 2012 | Recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma | 30 | Phase II trial Sunitinib 50-mg daily D1–28 q6w |
Glioblastoma ORR: 0% PFS-6: 17% Anaplastic glioma ORR: 0% PFS-6: 22% |
[72] |
Kreisl et al. | 2012 | Recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma | 64 | Phase II trial Vandetanib 300-mg daily |
Glioblastoma ORR: 13% PFS-6: 7% Anaplastic glioma ORR: 7% PFS-6: 7% |
[73] |
Muhic et al. | 2013 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 25 | Phase II trial Nintedanib 200 mg twice-daily |
ORR: 0% PFS-6: 4% |
[74] |
Reardon et al. | 2013 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 41 | Phase II trial Pazopanib 400-mg daily + lapatinib 1000-mg daily |
PTEN/EGFRvIII positive PFS-6: 0% PTEN/EGFRvIII negative PFS-6: 15% |
[75] |
Kreisl et al. | 2013 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 63 | Phase II trial Sunitinib 37.5-mg daily |
Bevacizumab naive PFS-6: 10% Bevacizumab resistant PFS-6: 0% |
[76] |
Batchelor et al. | 2013 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 325 | Phase III trial 1. Cediranib 20-mg daily + lomustine 110 mg/m2 q6w 2. Cediranib 30-mg daily 3. Placebo + lomustine 110 mg/m2 q6w |
ORR: 17 vs 15 vs 9% PFS-6: 35 vs 25 vs 16 mPFS: 4.1 vs 3.0 vs 2.7 m mOS: 9.4 vs 8.0 vs 9.8 m |
[77] |
PDGF inhibition | ||||||
Lassman et al. | 2011 | Recurrent glioblastoma with overexpression of dasatinib molecular targets | 50 | Phase II trial Dasatinib 100 mg twice-daily |
ORR: 0% PFS-6: 6% |
[78] |
mTOR inhibition | ||||||
Chang et al. | 2005 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 43 | Phase II trial Temsirolimus 250-mg intravenously weekly |
ORR: 5% PFS-6: 2% |
[79] |
Galanis et al. | 2005 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 65 | Phase II trial Temsirolimus 250-mg intravenously weekly |
ORR: 36% PFS-6: 8% |
[80] |
Kreisl et al. | 2009 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 22 | Phase II trial Everolimus 70-mg weekly + gefitinib 250-mg daily |
ORR: 14% PFS-6: 0% |
[81] |
PI3K inhibition | ||||||
Pitz et al. | 2015 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 33 | Phase II trial Sonolisib 8-mg daily |
ORR: 3% PFS-6: 17% |
[82] |
PKC inhibition | ||||||
Kreisl et al. | 2010 | Recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma | 118 | Phase II trial Enzastaurin 500–525-mg daily |
Glioblastoma ORR: 30% PFS-6: 7% Anaplastic glioma ORR: 15% PFS-6: 16% |
[83] |
Wick et al. | 2010 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 266 | Phase III trial 1. Enzastaurin 500-mg daily q6w 2. Lomustine 100–130 mg/m2 q6w |
ORR: 3 vs 4% PFS-6: 11 vs 19% mPFS: 1.5 vs 1.6 m mOS: 6.6 vs 7.1 m |
[84] |
c-Met inhibition | ||||||
Wen et al. (abstract) | 2010 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 124 | Phase II trial Cabozantinib 125–175-mg daily |
PFS-6: 21% | [85] |
Wen et al. | 2011 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 61 | Phase II trial Rilotumumab 10–20 mg/kg q2w |
ORR: 0% | [86] |
Integrin inhibition | ||||||
Reardon et al. | 2008 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 81 | Phase II trial 1. Cilengitide 500 mg twice-weekly 2. Cilengitide 2000 mg twice-weekly |
ORR: 5 vs 13% PFS-6: 10 vs 15% |
[87] |
Gilbert et al. | 2012 | Recurrent glioblastoma undergoing surgery | 30 | Phase II trial Cilengitide 2000 mg twice-weekly |
PFS-6: 12% | [88] |
Stupp et al. | 2014 | Newly diagnosed glioblastoma with MGMT promoter methylation | 545 | Randomized Phase III trial 1. Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy + cilengitide 2000 mg twice-weekly 2. Temozolomide chemoradiotherapy |
mPFS: 13.5 vs 10.7 m mOS: 26.3 vs 26.3 m |
[89] |
Microtubule inhibition | ||||||
Stupp et al. | 2011 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 38 | Phase II trial Sagopilone 16 mg/m2 q3w |
ORR: 0% PFS-6: 7% |
[90] |
Chamberlain et al. | 2014 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 56 | Phase II trial Verubulin 3.3 mg/m2 D1, 8, 15 q4w |
Bevacizumab naive PFS-6: 14% Bevacizumab resistant PFS-6: 8% |
[91] |
Histone deacetylase inhibition | ||||||
Galanis et al. | 2009 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 66 | Phase II trial Vorinostat 200 mg twice-daily D1–14 q3w |
ORR: 3% PFS-6: 15% |
[92] |
Friday et al. | 2012 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 37 | Phase II trial Vorinostat 400-mg daily D1–14 q3w + bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 D1, 4, 8, 11 q3w |
ORR: 3% PFS-6: 0% |
[93] |
Lee et al. | 2015 | Recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic glioma | 39 | Phase II trial Panobinostat 30 mg D1, 3, 5 q2w + bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q2w |
Glioblastoma ORR: 29% PFS-6: 30% Anaplastic glioma ORR: 27% PFS-6: 47% |
[94] |
TGF-β inhibition | ||||||
Brandes et al. | 2016 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 158 | Phase II trial 1. Galunisertib 150 mg twice-daily D1–14 q4w + lomustine 100–130 mg/m2 q6w 2. Galunisertib 150 mg twice-daily D1–14 q4w 3. Placebo + lomustine 100–130 mg/m2 q6w |
ORR: 1 vs 5 vs 0% PFS-6: 6 vs 15 vs 6% mPFS: 2 vs 2 vs 2 m mOS: 6.7 vs 8.0 vs 7.5 m |
[95] |
XPO inhibition | ||||||
Mau-Sørensen (abstract) | 2016 | Recurrent glioblastoma | 35 | Phase II trial 1. Selinexor 50 mg/m2 twice-daily ×3, then surgery 2. Selinexor 50 mg/m2 twice-daily 3. Selinexor 60 mg twice-daily 4. Selinexor 80-mg daily |
Pooled results ORR: 11% PFS-6: 15% |
[96] |
D#: Day #; EGFRvIII: EGFR variant III; m: Month; mAb: Monoclonal antibody; MGMT: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; mOS: Median overall survival; mPFS: Median progression-free survival; N: Number; ORR: Objective response rate; PFS-6: Progression-free survival rate at 6 months; PTEN: Phosphate and tensin homolog; q8w: Every # weeks; XPO: Exportin-1.