Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 7;5:42. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00042

Table 5.

Morbidity and mortality in meta-analyses comparing D1 to D2 Lymphadenectomy.

D1 vs D2 CI p I2 p(I2) First author(reference) Included trials
Anastomotic Leakage RR: 0.47 0.31–0.71 <0.001 0 0.42 Jiang (28) S, H, B, T, D, I *
Pancreatic Leakage RR: 0.47 0.13–0.76 0.01 0 0.97 H, T, D, I *
Reoperation Rate RR: 0.46 0.28–0.76 0.002 7 0.37 H, T, D, I *
Haemorrhage RR: 0.69 0.36–1.33 0.27 5 0.38 H, T, D, I *
Wound infection RR: 0.51 0.32–0.83 0.006 0 0.53 S, B, T, D, *
Pulmonary Complications RR: 0.48 0.33–0.71 <0.001 0 0.58 S, B, D, I *
Mortality D1 vs D2 RR: 0.58 0.47–0.71 <0.001 0% 0.68 Jiang (28) S, H, B, T, D, I *
Mortality D2 vs D1 RR: 2.02 1.34–3.04 <0.001 0% 0.66 Mocellin (25) H, B, T, D, I
*

Dutch Data from Hartring et al 2004  (16)

Includes data from Li Wei Wen et al 2007  (29)

CI, 95% CI; RR, relative risk.

S, South African; H, Hong Kong; B, British; T, Taiwanese; D, Dutch; I, Italian.