Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 11;6:e5010. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5010

Table 1. A summary of the results for the current experiments and a benchmark face matching task.

Source Stimuli % Overall Hit rate False alarm rate d’ c
Experiment 1 2 infant faces 72.0 (6.03) 0.71 (0.12) 0.27 (0.12) 1.26 (0.42) 0.03 (0.35)
Experiment 2 1 infant + 1 child face 64.4 (7.71) 0.64 (0.11) 0.35 (0.11) 0.78 (0.45) 0.02 (0.23)
Experiment 3A 2 infant faces 56.4 (7.04) 0.47 (0.16) 0.34 (0.17) 0.37 (0.43) 0.27 (0.44)
Experiment 3A 1 infant + 1 child face 52.9 (8.62) 0.54 (0.15) 0.49 (0.17) 0.15 (0.48) −0.04 (0.39)
Experiment 3A 2 adult faces (GFMT short ver.) 73.3 (12.7) 0.76 (0.19) 0.30 (0.20) 1.52 (0.92) −0.11 (0.52)
Experiment 3B 2 infant faces 55.7 (7.09) 0.44 (0.21) 0.33 (0.21) 0.34 (0.42) 0.36 (0.62)
Experiment 3B 1 infant + 1 child face 51.5 (7.63) 0.53 (0.20) 0.50 (0.20) 0.08 (0.43) −0.02 (0.57)
Experiment 3B 2 adult faces (GFMT short ver.) 70.4 (12.89) 0.71 (0.23) 0.30 (0.23) 1.34 (0.87) −0.01 (0.69)
Burton, White & McNeill (2010) 2 adult faces (GFMT) 89.9 (7.3) 0.92 (0.08) 0.12 (0.11) 2.91 (0.83) −0.09 (0.35)
Bobak, Dowsett & Bate (2016) 2 adult faces (GFMT) 87.4 (5.26) 0.91 (0.07) 0.12 (0.08) 2.82 (0.73) −0.11 (0.32)
Burton, White & McNeill (2010) 2 adult faces (GFMT short ver.) 81.2 (9.4) 0.80 (0.14) 0.18 (0.12) 2.04 (0.84) 0.06 (0.39)

Notes:

Values presented are M (SD).

GFMT, The Glasgow face matching test.