Table 4.
Self‐report assessments of anxiety and associated constructs within the LFLSAD sample, per generation
|
Generation 1 (n = 62) (mean ± SD; range) |
Generation 2 (n = 70) (mean ± SD; range) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| LSAS‐SRa | Total | 31.4 ± 25.0 (2–95) | 33.7 ± 23.3 (7–98) |
| Fear | 16.1 ± 13.0 (0–52) | 17.0 ± 13.2 (0–58) | |
| Avoidance | 15.3 ± 12.8 (0–50) | 16.7 ± 11.1 (2–42) | |
| SAS‐Ab | Total | 35.8 ± 9.2 (20–56) | |
| Fear of negative evaluation | 14.9 ± 5.2 (8–26) | ||
| Social avoidance and distress—New | 13.9 ± 4.6 (6–26) | ||
| Social avoidance and distress—General | 6.9 ± 2.3 (4–14) | ||
| BFNE‐II‐Rc | Total | 16.3 ± 11.6 (0–48) | 15.0 ± 10.5 (0–47) |
| STAI traitd | Total | 36.0 ± 10.4 (20–64) | 35.0 ± 8.1 (21–57) |
| BDIa | Total | 7.3 ± 8.1 (0–32) | 7.6 ± 7.0 (1–30) |
| CDIb | Total | 6.6 ± 4.5 (0–23) | |
| Positive affectd | Total | 32.3 ± 7.3 (15–47) | 32.7 ± 5.7 (21–45) |
| Negative affectd | Total | 17.5 ± 6.9 (10–40) | 16.9 ± 5.0 (10–31) |
| BIS‐BASe | BIS—Total | 19.8 ± 4.5 (7–28) | 18.5 ± 3.9 (9–28) |
| BAS—Total | 37.2 ± 5.0 (26–50) | 39.1 ± 4.3 (31–48) | |
| BIS‐BAS‐Cf | BIS—Total | 7.2 ± 4.2 (1–17) | |
| BAS—Total | 17.6 ± 5.2 (9–27) | ||
Note. LSAS‐SR = Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale—self‐report (Fresco et al., 2001; Mennin et al., 2002); SAS‐A = Social Anxiety Scale—adolescents (La Greca & Lopez, 1998); BFNE‐II‐R = revised Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation II scale (Carleton et al., 2006; Leary, 1983); STAI = State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger et al., 1970); BDI‐II = Beck Depression Inventory II (Beck et al., 1996; Van der Does, 2002); CDI = Children's Depression Inventory (Kovacs, 1983, 1985; Timbremont & Braet, 2002); BIS/BAS = Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Scales (Carver & White, 1994); BIS/BAS‐C = Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Scales for children (Muris et al., 2005); LFLSAD = Leiden Family Lab study on Social Anxiety Disorder.
Generation 1: Data from 62 participants; Generation 2: Data from 33 participants.
Generation 2: Data from 37 participants.
Generation 1: Data from 60 participants; Generation 2: Data from 70 participants.
Generation 1: Data from 62 participants; Generation 2: Data from 70 participants.
Generation 1: Data from 62 participants; Generation 2: Data from 52 participants.
Generation 2: Data from 18 participants.