Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 11;14:1493–1504. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S137776

Table 1.

Comparison of methods in studies on EEG AA

No Study Sample Age (years) % female Classification of depressive status Method EEG detail
Experimental group CG Experimental group CG Reference montage EO/EC Recording length (min) Alpha range (Hz)
1 Liu et al57 EG: N = 141 (38 melancholic MDD and 103 non-melancholic MDD) CG: 113 non-MDD patients EG1 – melancholic: M = 35.92 (SD = 12.86) and EG2 – non-melancholic: M = 32.79 (SD = 11.66) CG: M = 32.56 (SD = 12.50) 66.50 SCID, HRS Group comparison LMas EO + EC 6 × 1 7.8–12.7
2 Cantisani et al66 EG: 20 patients with a diagnosis of MDD CG: 19 healthy adults EG: M = 43.3 (SD = 14.03) CG: M = 41.05 (SD = 13.82) 53.80 SCID, HAMD, MADRS, BDI Group comparison and correlation CA EO + EC 6 8–12.5
3 Arns et al73 EG: 1,008 MDD patients CG: 336 healthy controls EG: M = 37.84 (SD = 12.6) CG: M = 36.99 (SD = 13.1) 57 MINI-Plus, HRSD Group comparison LMas EO + EC 2 × 2 8–13
4 Stewart et al71 EG: 143 MDD CG: 163 healthy controls M = 19.1 (SD = 0.1) Range: 17–34 69.00 SCID, BDI Group comparison CA, Cz, LMas, CSD EO + EC 8 × 1 8–13
5 Manna et al82 EG1: 14 high- anxiety depressive and EG2: 14 low-anxiety depressive CG: 21 healthy controls EG1: M = 39.9 (SD = 11.7) and EG2: M = 31.4 (SD = 11.7) CG: M = 34.0 (SD = 11.8) 57.10 BDI Group comparison LMas EO 8–13
6 Escolano et al74 74 MDD patients were randomly allocated to the NF group (n = 50) or to the CG (n = 24) CG: 24 MDD patients randomly selected NF group: M = 53.70 (SD = 10.87) CG: M = 49.50 (SD = 10.18) 68.30 BDI-II, PHQ-9 Group comparison FPz, l ear EO + EC 6 8–12
7 Spronk et al, 200876 8 patients with MDD M = 42.6 (range 28–50) 37.50 BDI, MINI-Plus LMas EO + EC 4 8–13; alpha 1 (8–11) and alpha 2 (11–13)
8 Mathersul et al54 428 subjects selected from the Brain Resource International Database M = 34.85 (SD = 12.59), range 18–60 50 DASS-21 Group comparison CA EC 2 8–13
9 Pössel et al, 200877 80 mentally healthy adolescents M = 13.92 (SD = 0.57), range: 13–15 43.75 DSQ, DISYPS-KJ: SBB-DE Regression analyses Nose EO + EC 4 × 2 8–13
10 Tops et al79 11 healthy male volunteers M = 27.7, range: 19–42 0 BDI Group comparison l ear/LE EO + EC 2 8–13
11 Metzger et al75 50 female Vietnam War nurse veterans M = 53.7 (SD = 2.8) 100 SCID, SCL-90-R Correlation LE EO + EC 2 × 3 8–13
12 Kentgen et al80 EG: 25 outpatients (19 MDD [11 MDD + current anxiety disorder] and 6 anxiety disorders) CG: 10 non-ill controls M = 15.5, range: 12.2–18.8 100 PARIS, K-SADS, DISC-2.3-C Group comparison Nose EO + EC 2 × 3 7.8–12.5
13 Graae et al65 EG: 16 Hispanic females after suicide attempt CG: 22 normal Hispanic adolescent girls M = 14, range: 12–17 100 BDI, HASS Group comparison Nose, C3 & C4 EO + EC 2 × 3 8–13
14 Adolph and Margraf59 43 healthy students showing symptoms of depression or anxiety Range: 19–34 65.12 D-S Regression analyses l-Mas EO + EC 8 8–13
15 Cantisani et al66 EG: 20 MDD patients CG: 19 healthy controls EG: M = 43.3 (SD = 14.03) CG: M = 41.05 (SD = 13.82) 53.80 SCID, HAMD, MADRS, BDI Group comparison and correlation Cz EC 6 Lower alpha: 8–10 and upper alpha: 10.5–12.5
16 Moynihan et al67 EG: 105 MBSR group CG: 103 EG: M = 73.3 (SD = 6.7) CG: M = 73.6 (SD = 6.7) 59.60 CES-D-R Group comparison r-Mas EO + EC 8 × 1 8–13
17 Bruder et al81 EG: high-risk group (37) CG: low-risk group (38) EG: M = 33.9 (SD = 11.7) CG: M = 27.4 (SD = 13.5) 53.33 SADS-L, K-SADS-E, K-SADS-PL Group comparison and correlation l ear EO + EC 4 × 2 7.0–12.5
18 Keune et al68 N = 57 recurrently depressed women in remission EG: mindfulness support group 25 CG: rumination challenge group (32) EG: M = 43.56 (SD = 9.67) CG: M = 49.09 (SD = 10.82) 100 BDI-II, PANAS Group comparison and correlation LMas EO + EC 8 × 1 and 10 8–13
19 Segrave et al85 EG: 16 MDD CG: 18 controls EG: M = 40.75 (SD = 11.39) CG: M = 42.11 (SD = 13.02) 100 BDI, MINI-Plus, MADRS Group comparison Cz, CA EO + EC 2 × 3 8–13 and IAF
20 Chan et al55 Participants with depression, EG1: 17 CBT and EG2: 17 DMBI Participants with depression, CG: WL EG1: M = 46.94 (SD = 6.54) and EG2: M = 47.06 (SD = 9.54) CG: M = 45.44 (SD = 8.25) 80 SCID Group comparison and correlation LE EC 5 8–13
21 Gordon et al60 EG: 567 participants across 6 clinical groups CG: 1,908 healthy control participants from the BRID Range: 6–87 45.80 MINI Group comparison LMas EO + EC 2 × 2 8–13
22 Kemp et al51 EG: 14 patients with PTSD and 15 patients with MDD CG: 15 healthy controls EG – PTSD: M = 41.4 (SD = 12.3) and MDD: M = 39.9 (SD = 14.0) CG: M = 42.4 (SD = 16.7) 61.40 MINI, HRSD, DASS Group comparison LMas EC 2 8–13
23 Beaton et al63 Undergraduate students, EG: 24 high socially anxious Undergraduate students, CG: 25 low socially anxious M = 20.32 (SD = 4.18) 75.50 DASS-21 Group comparison and correlation Cz EC + EO 2 8–13
24 De Raedt et al64 20 volunteer students 85 BDI-II Regression analyses Cz EC 2 8–12
25 Bruder et al84 EG1: 19 highest risk group and EG2: 14 intermediate risk group CG: 16 lowest risk group EG1: M = 15.4 (SD = 4.7) and EG2: M = 10.6 (SD = 4.5) CG: M = 13.6 (SD = 6.2) 53 SADS-L, K-SADS-E, K-SADS-PL Group comparison LE EO + EC 4 × 2 7.0–12.5
26 McFarland et al70 70 participants M = 34.64 (SD = 12.97), range: 18–63 65.70 SCID Correlation LE EO + EC 6 × 1 8–13
27 Diego et al52 Woman (effects of maternal depression), EG: 20 undefined (CES-D = 0–2); 10 borderline (CES-D = 13–15), 69 depressed (CES-D >16) CG: 64 non- depressed (CES-D = 3–12) M = 23 (SD = 5.0) 100 CES-D Group comparison and correlation Cz 3 8–12
28 Bruder et al4 EG: 44 depressed outpatients CG: 26 normal patients EG: anxious group: M = 36.7 (SD = 11.5); Nonanxious: M = 41.3 (SD = 10.7) CG: M = 32.9 (SD = 9.8) 50 BDI Group comparison and correlation Nose EO + EC 2 × 3 7.8–12.5
29 Tomarken et al53 EG: 25 high-risk patients CG: 13 low-risk patients EG: M = 13.1 (SD = 0.3) CG: M = 13.0 (SD = 0.4) 52.60 SCID, K-SADS-E, CDI, K-LIFE Group comparison and regression analyses Cz EO + EC 8 × 1 8.5–12.5
30 Jesulola et al20 100 participants 32.5 (SD = 14.13) 54 SDS Group comparison and correlation CA EO + EC 3 × 3 8–13
31 Kaiser et al17 39 females: EG1: anxiety + depression; EG2: depression participants CG: healthy participants EG1: M = 78.6 (SD = 6.7) and EG2: M = 80.5 (SD = 5.7) CG: M = 80.9 (SD = 7.0) 100 HADS-A, HADS-D, GDS Group comparison and correlation r-Mas EC + EO 3 Alpha 1 (6.9–8.9), alpha 2 (8.9–10.9), and alpha 3 (10.9–12.9)
32 Brzezicka et al83 EG: 26 depressed patients CG: 26 controls M = 26.42 (SD = 6.5) ICD-10 classification criteria Group comparison and correlation CSD EC 5 8–13
33 Mennella et al35 EG: 23 dysphoric individuals CG: 24 nondysphoric individuals EG: M = 21.0 (SD = 1.6) CG: M = 15.9 (SD = 4.4) 100 BDI-II, SCID Group comparison l-Mas EO 5 8–13
34 Quinn et al58 EG: 117 MDD patients (57 with melancholia and 60 with non- melancholia) CG: 120 healthy controls MINI-Plus Group comparison LMas, CA EC 2 8–13
35 Gold et al8 79 adults M = 35.6 (SD = 9.8), range: 18–50 78.5 MADRS, HADS-A Correlations EC EC 5 8–12
36 Allen and Cohen56 306 young adults – 143 with MDD M = 19.1 (SE = 0.1), range: 17–34 69 BDI Group comparison and correlation Cz, CSD EC + EO 8 8–13
37 Saletu et al61 EG: 60 female depressed menopausal syndrome patients CG: 30 normal controls EG: M = 51.10 (SD = 3.13) 100 DSM-IIIR Group comparison (SPM) EC 7 8–10
38 Carvalho et al16 EG1: 12 depressed patients and EG2: 8 remitted patients CG: 7 non-depressed patients M = 71.3 66.60 DSM-IV Group comparison l ear EC 8 8–12.9
39 Deslandes et al15 EG: 22 depressed elderly participants CG: 14 healthy elderly participants EG: M = 71.6 (SD = 1.2) CG: M = 72.4 (SD = 1.7) 94.40 DSM-IV Group comparison LE EC 8 8–13
40 Putnam and McSweeney62 EG: 6 depressed outpatient groups CG: 7 healthy CG EG: M = 32.6 (SD = 12.1) CG: M = 32.8 (SD = 11.3) 69.20 BDI Group comparison Cz EC + EO 4 × 4 8–13
41 Barnhofer et al69 22 individuals with a previous history of suicidal depression were randomly assigned to either MBCT (n = 10) or treatment-as-usual group (n = 12) CG: 12 treatment-as-usual group EG: M = 48.0 (SD = 10.2) CG: M = 38.6 (SD = 9.6) 50 BDI Group comparison CA, LE EC + EO 8 8–13
42 Bruder et al47 EG1: 18 subjects were both parents and had an MDD and EG2: 40 subjects were one parent and had an MDD CG: 29 subjects were neither parent and had an MDD EG1: M = 29.0 (SD = 11.0), range: 8–47 and EG2: M = 37.0 (SD = 8.0), range: 22–50 CG: M = 37.1 (SD = 4.7), range: 29–47 60.90 SADS-L, K-SADS-E, K-SADS-PL Group comparison l ear EC 4 × 2 7.0–12.5
43 Allen et al14 30 women range: 18–45 100 SCID Group comparison and correlation Cz, LMas EO + EC 8 8–13
44 Debener et al72 EG: 15 clinically depressed patients CG: 22 healthy adults EG: M = 48.5, range: 23–64 CG: M = 45.9, range: 26–64 67.6 Structural clinical interview ICD-10 Group comparison LE EO + EC 2 8–13

Abbreviations: AA, alpha asymmetry; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BRID, Brain Resource International Database; C3 and C4, average between central left and right; CA, common average; CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy; CG, control group; CES-D-R, depression scale-revised; CSD, current source density transformation; Cz, the midline central position; DASS, depression anxiety stress scales; DISC-2.3-C, Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children; DISYPS-KJ: SBB-DE, self-rating questionnaire for depressive disorders measures symptom criteria in accordance with DSM-IV diagnoses of depressive disorders; DSQ, depressions-screening questionnaire; DMBI, Chan-based Dejian mind-body intervention; DSM-IIIR, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised; DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition; EC, eyes closed; EEG, electroencephalogram; EG, experimental group; EO, eyes open; FPz, frontal-midline electrode; GDS, geriatric depression scale; HADS-A, hospital anxiety and depression scale; HADS-D, hospital anxiety and depression scale – German version; HAMD, Hamilton depression rating scale; HASS, Harkavy, Asnis Suicide scale; HRS, Hamilton rating scale; HRSD, Hamilton rating scale for depression; K-SADS, schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia; K-SADS-PL, Kiddie-sads-present and lifetime version; LE, left ear; LMas, left-mastoid; M, median; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MBCT, Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; MBSR, mindfulness-based stress reduction; MINI-Plus, mini-international neuropsychiatric interview; MDD, major depressive disorder; NF, neurofeedback; PANAS, positive and negative affect scales; PARIS, Parent as Respondent Informant Schedule; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; SE, standard error; SADS-L, schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia lifetime version for adults and for children between the ages 6 and 17, the child version (K-SADS-E); SCID, structured clinical interview for DSM-IV; SCL-90-R, symptom checklist revised; SPM, statistical parametric maps; WL, waitlist control group.