Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 9;5(1):e000211. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000211

Table 1.

The proportion of fresh samples from different sources with pH ≤5.5 and the diagnostic accuracy of using this cut-off to detect gastric source overall, and in the presence or absence of prior antacid medication and confounding factors

Sample All Antacid medication No antacid
medication
All confounding
factors*
Number with pH ≤5.5/total n (%)
Gastric 65/96 (68) 30/42 (71) 35/54 (65) 32/44 (73)
Oesophageal 59/90 (66) 26/41 (63) 33/49 (67) 26/42 (62)
Saliva 2/101 (2) 2/40 (5) 0/61 (0) 2/43 (5)
Bronchial 0/103 (0) 0/41 (0) 0/62 (0) 0/45 (0)
Diagnostic test Gastric pH versus all other samples (95% CI)
Sensitivity % 68 (57, 77) 71 (55, 84) 65 (51, 77) 73 (57, 85)
Specificity % 79 (74, 84) 77 (69, 84) 81 (74, 86) 79 (70, 85)
PPV % 52 (45, 58) 52 (42, 61) 52 (43, 61) 53 (44, 62)
NPV % 88 (85, 91) 89 (83, 93) 88 (84, 91) 90 (83, 92)
PLR 3.3 (2.5, 4.2) 3.1 (2.1, 4.5) 3.4 (2.3, 4.9) 4.0 (2.4, 5.7)
NLR 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) 0.4 (0.2, 0.6) 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) 0.4 (0.3, 0.6)
Overall accuracy† % 76 (72, 81) 76 (68, 82) 77 (68, 82) 77 (70, 83)

*Confounding included antacid medication, pernicious anaemia or gastric surgery.

†Refers to the probability that the aspirate will be correctly identified.

NLR, negative likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; PPV, positive predictive value.