1:1 |
ECe = 3(EC1:1) |
-- |
-- |
Theoretical & likely to produce a higher predicted than necessary. Specific multiplication factors for conversion ranged between 2.78 and 1.6 based on the dominant salt type. |
[64] |
1:1 |
ECe = 3.01(EC1:1) -0.06 |
0.98 |
Coarse |
Suspension to Saturated Extract |
[60] |
1:1 |
ECe = 3.01(EC1:1) -0.77 |
0.98 |
Medium |
Suspension to Saturated Extract |
[60] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.66(EC1:1) -0.97 |
0.98 |
Fine |
Suspension to Saturated Extract |
[60] |
1:1 |
ECe = 1.85(EC1:1) |
0.85 |
-- |
Only the regression without y-intercept was used in their validation. The regression equation of their validation set is also significantly different than that of their training set. Only their equation without a y-intercept is used here. |
[67] |
1:1 |
ECe = 3.01(EC1:1) -0.06 |
-- |
Coarse |
Specifically states they are not well calibrated & are a rough guide to interpretation only |
[68] |
1:1 |
ECe = 3.01(EC1:1) -0.77 |
-- |
Medium |
Specifically states they are not well calibrated & are a rough guide to interpretation only |
[68] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.96(EC1:1) -0.95 |
-- |
Fine |
Specifically states they are not well calibrated & are a rough guide to interpretation only |
[68] |
1:1 |
ECe = 1.93(EC1:1) -0.57 |
-- |
-- |
1:1 predictions were closer to ECe than their other dilutions (1:2.5, 1:5) |
[69] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.72(EC1:1) -1.27 |
0.99 |
Sandy |
-- |
[63] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.42(EC1:1) |
0.98 |
Sandy |
-- |
[63] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.15(EC1:1) -0.44 |
0.99 |
Loamy |
-- |
[63] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.06(EC1:1) |
0.98 |
Loamy |
-- |
[63] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.23(EC1:1) -0.58 |
0.98 |
Combined |
-- |
[63] |
1:1 |
ECe = 2.11(EC1:1) |
0.98 |
Combined |
-- |
[63] |
1:1 |
ECe = 3.35(EC1:1) |
0.95 |
— |
-- |
[69] |
1:2 |
ECe = 2.79(EC1:2) +0.71 |
0.91 |
Coarse |
Extract to saturated extract |
[60] |
1:2 |
ECe = 2.35(EC1:2) -0.36 |
0.95 |
Medium |
Extract to saturated extract |
[60] |
1:2 |
ECe = 2.16(EC1:2) +0.03 |
0.97 |
Fine |
Extract to saturated extract |
[60] |
1:5 |
ECe = 5.97(EC1:5) -1.17 |
-- |
-- |
1:1 predictions were closer to ECe than their other dilutions (1:2.5, 1:5) |
[69] |
1:5 |
ECe = 8.22(EC1:5) -0.33 |
0.98 |
Sandy |
-- |
[63] |
1:5 |
ECe = 7.98(EC1:5) |
0.98 |
Sandy |
-- |
[63] |
1:5 |
ECe = 7.58(EC1:5) +0.06 |
0.99 |
Loamy |
-- |
[63] |
1:5 |
ECe = 7.62(EC1:5) |
0.99 |
Loamy |
-- |
[63] |
1:5 |
ECe = 7.68(EC1:5) -0.16 |
0.98 |
Combined |
-- |
[63] |
1:5 |
ECe = 7.57(EC1:5) |
0.98 |
Combined |
-- |
[63] |
1:5 |
ECe = 5.35(EC1:5) |
0.96 |
Combined |
See source for greater range of specialized conversions by texture & presence of gypsum |
[70] |
1:5 |
ECe = 7.31(EC1:5) |
0.91 |
none |
-- |
[71] |
1:5 |
ECe = (EC1:5)(Q1:5/Qe) |
-- |
sample |
Q1:5 can be assessed as (500 + 6ADMC) for a 1:5 soil to water suspension (where ADMC is air dry moisture content expressed as kg/100 kg). |
[61] |
ECe
|
EC1:1 = 0.33(ECe) +0.06 |
-- |
Coarse |
Specifically states they are not well calibrated & are a rough guide to interpretation only |
[68] |
ECe
|
EC1:1 = 0.33(ECe) +0.77 |
-- |
Medium |
Specifically states they are not well calibrated & are a rough guide to interpretation only |
[68] |
ECe
|
EC1:1 = 0.375(ECe) +0.97 |
-- |
Fine |
Specifically states they are not well calibrated & are a rough guide to interpretation only |
[68] |