Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 21;8(2):269–284. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0236-3

Table 2.

Values applied for vaccine-specific inputs for base-case and sensitivity analyses and data sources

Age group (years) Base value (%) Rangea (bounds-%) Data sources
Lower Upper Base value Range
Initial HZ efficacy: RZV (one dose) 50–69 90.00 58.90 98.90 [21] [21]
≥ 70 69.50 24.90 89.10 [21] [21]
Initial HZ efficacy: RZV (two doses) 50–69 98.40 95.00 100.00 [21] [21]
≥ 70 97.84 94.10 100.00 [21] [21]
Initial HZ efficacy: VVL 50–59 69.80 54.10 80.60 [29] [29]
60–69 63.89 56.00 71.00 [28, 46] [21, 46]
70–79 40.85 28.00 52.00 [28, 46] [21, 46]
≥ 80 18.25 0.00 48.00 [28, 46] [21, 46]
Initial PHN efficacy: RZV (one dose) 50–69 90.00 [21] N/A
≥ 70 69.50 [21] N/A
Initial PHN efficacy: RZV (two doses) 50–59 98.40 [21] N/A
≥ 70 97.84 [21] N/A
Initial PHN efficacy: VVL 50–59 69.80 Assumedb N/A
60–69 65.69 [28, 46] N/A
70–79 73.38 [28, 46] N/A
≥ 80 39.51 [28, 46] N/A
Annual waning of efficacy: RZV (one dose) All for years 1–4 5.40 1.00 7.40 Assumedc [21]
All for years ≥ 5 5.10 3.60 6.90 Assumedc [21]
Annual waning of efficacy: RZV (two doses) 50–69 for years 1–4 1.00 0.00 2.60 [21] [21]
50–69 for years ≥ 5 2.30 0.70 4.60 [21] [21]
≥ 70 3.60 1.40 6.60 [21] [21]
Annual waning of efficacy: VVL All for years 1–4 5.40 4.50 6.40 [21] [21]
All for years ≥ 5 5.10 4.10 6.00 [21] [21]
Coverage All 40.00 20.00 60.00 Assumedd Assumedd
Second-dose compliance for RZV All 95.00 70.00 100.00 [31, 32]e Assumede

RZV Recombinant Zoster Vaccine, VVL Varicella Vaccine Live, HZ Herpes Zoster, PHN Postherpetic Neuralgia, N/A Not Applicable

a–, Not varied in the sensitivity analysis

bAssumed to be the same as the initial efficacy in preventing HZ

cAssumed to be the same as the waning rate of VVL efficacy

dAssumed to be the same as that in a recently introduced vaccine for elderly, pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine-23 [34]. Assumed to be ± 20% of base case for the upper/lower bound, respectively

eAs there were no available data in Japan, second-dose compliance in this analysis was assumed to be the same as that obtained from two clinical trials [31, 32]. Assumed to be 70 and 100% for the lower/upper bound, respectively