Table 2.
Bacteria | Fungi | Archaea | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | R2 | P | F | R2 | P | F | R2 | P | |
(A) COMPARISON BETWEEN CROPS | |||||||||
Cropa | 6.5811 | 0.08803 | 0.001 | 9.0571 | 0.11556 | 0.001 | 0.53306 | 0.00918 | 0.001 |
Biotopeb | 14.8921 | 0.0996 | 0.001 | 20.6269 | 0.13159 | 0.001 | 0.95217 | 0.0082 | 0.001 |
Crop:Biotope | 3.7289 | 0.04988 | 0.001 | 2.5067 | 0.03198 | 0.001 | 0.05581 | 0.00096 | 0.975 |
(B) COMPARISON AMONG CANOLA TREATMENTS | |||||||||
Treatmentc | 0.5422 | 0.01436 | 0.339 | 0.9714 | 0.02221 | 0.189 | 0.14253 | 0.00427 | 0.287 |
Biotope | 7.7775 | 0.103 | 0.001 | 18.0785 | 0.20666 | 0.001 | 0.46114 | 0.00691 | 0.013 |
Treatment:Biotope | 0.3239 | 0.00858 | 1 | 0.7288 | 0.01666 | 0.465 | 0.01297 | 0.00039 | 0.998 |
Significant effects greater than or equal to P < 0.05 are indicated in bold.
All canola samples (Can_RE, canola grown as recommended; Can_HF, canola fertilized at 150% of the recommended rate; and Can_HD, canola seeded at 150% of the recommended rate) were compared with wheat and pea.
Roots or rhizosphere soil.
Canola treatments were Can_RE, Can_HF and Can_HD.