Table 4.

Studies Including a Simulation Training Design

Nath an & Gor man (200 2) Crite ria	Aut hors	Samp le	Interve ntion & Conditi on to Treat	Intend ed Traine es	Ong oing Supp ort	Design				Measurement Method			Findings
						Ran dom Assi gn.	# and Comp. Group s	Trai ning Dosa ge	Foll ow- up	Do mai n	Ty pe	Stand ard- ized Meas ure
1	Harned et al. 2014	181 clinicians	Exposure therapy for anxiety disorders	Mental health treatment providers	Yes, C	Yes	3: 1. SI/SM 2. SI/SM+ME 3. SI/SM + ME + OS	10 hours	6 & 12 weeks	A, K, SA, S, U	BO, SR	Mixed	SI/SM + ME + OS showed greatest improvements in knowledge (g = .38), attitudes (g = 43), and skill (g = .39); All conditions equal for satisfaction, use, and attitudes
3	Kobak et al. 2017	70 clinicians	CBT for anxiety disorders	Community clinicians	No	No	0 (pre-post)	9 modules	No	K, S, U, X	SR	Yes	Knowledge: g = 3.68; Skill: g = 3.11; High satisfaction, use, and positive client outcomes post-training

Note. Ongoing Support: C = Consultation, S = Supervision; Comparison Groups: C = Non-Training Control, FTF = Face-To-Face or In-Person, ME = Motivational Enhancement, SM = Simulation, SI = Serial Instruction, VC = Virtual Classroom, WM = Written Materials; Measurement Domains: A = Attitudes, AC = Acceptability, B = Burnout, BA = Barriers, C = Training Completion, E = Engagement, F = Fidelity or Adherence, FE = Feasibility, I = Importance, K = Knowledge, P = Preparedness, S = Skill, SA = Satisfaction, SE = Self-Efficacy or Confidence, U = Use, X = Client Outcomes; Measurement Type: BO = Behavioral Observation, SR = Self Report; Effect Size: X: Insufficient information to calculate effect size.