Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;39(6):1008–1016. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5675

Table 3:

nRCBV low- vs high-grade thresholds and ROC analysis results

Team/ Entry No. Software Platform Leakage Correction Used LG vs HG (P Value) Threshold SN SP AUC
A1 IB Neuro Yes 5.34E-06 1.605 0.861 0.846 0.889
B1 IB Neuro Yes 5.36E-06 1.605 0.861 0.846 0.889
C1 IB Neuro Yes 5.39E-06 1.605 0.861 0.846 0.889
B2 Matlab Yes 2.02E-06 1.315 0.972 0.769 0.892
B3 Matlab Yes 1.75E-06 1.330 0.972 0.769 0.896
D1 nordicICE Yes 3.30E-06 1.305 0.972 0.769 0.895
D2 nordicICE Yes 3.30E-06 1.305 0.972 0.769 0.895
E1 PGUI (LC) Yes 7.32E-06 1.615 0.861 0.846 0.892
E2 PGUI (C) Yes 1.14E-05 1.400 0.861 0.769 0.871
E3 PGUI (PM LC) Yes 1.18E-05 1.400 0.889 0.769 0.856
D3 Slicer Yes 1.08E-06 1.415 0.944 0.769 0.891
F1 FIAT Yes 2.50E-05 1.235 0.944 0.769 0.853
G1 McCBV Yes 1.26E-06 1.425 0.944 0.769 0.891
A3 IB Neuro No 1.55E-06 1.330 0.917 0.769 0.895
B4 IB Neuro No 1.56E-06 1.330 0.917 0.769 0.895
E4 PGUI No 6.94E-06 1.450 0.861 0.769 0.887
E5 PGUI No 5.67E-05 1.585 0.806 0.846 0.872
E6 PGUI No 1.19E-05 1.395 0.861 0.769 0.873

Note:—AUC indicates area under the curve; LG, low-grade; HG, high-grade.