Table 2.

Logistic regression associations of different forms of parental fat talk with child disordered eating and weight.

	χ2	df	p	Nagelkerke R2	Child Sex Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Child Age Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Self-Fat talk Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Obesity-Fat Talk Odds Ratio (95% CI)	Child-Fat talk Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Binge Eating	67.41	5	<.001	.168	1.22 (0.80–1.85)	1.11 (0.73–1.68)	1.39 (0.76– 2.55)	1.19 (0.75–1.88)	4.86*** (3.03–7.78)
Overeating	51.88	5	<.001	.116	0.89 (0.63–1.27)	1.21 (0.85–1.73)	1.02 (0.65–1.60)	1.36 (0.93–1.98)	2.93*** (2.02–4.27)
Secretive Eating	66.63	5	<.001	.160	1.58* (1.06–2.37)	1.10 (0.74–1.65)	1.26 (0.72– 2.20)	1.46 (0.95–2.27)	4.04*** (2.60– 6.26)
Overweight/Obesity	55.79	5	<.001	.124	0.57** (0.40–0.81)	0.78 (0.55–1.11)	0.91 (0.59–1.42)	0.68 (0.47–1.00)	3.40*** (2.31–5.01)

Note.

^*p<.05,

^**p<.01,

^***p<.001.

Child sex was coded 0=male, 1=female; child age was coded 0=pre-adolescent, 1=adolescent.