Table 3.
The relationship of BPD diagnosis with aggression, victimization, CTS-2 subscales, and institutional misconduct during incarceration
Disciplinary Incidents/ Infractions a |
Time Spent in Isolation b |
Aggression During Incarceration c |
Victimization During Incarceration c |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
OR[95% CI] | B (SE) | B (SE) | B (SE) | |
Age | .003** [.00, .06] | −.10 (.09) | −.14+ (.08) | −.09 (.08) |
BPD Diagnosis | 1.76+ [.93, 3.32] | −.02 (.12) | .08 (.08) | .06 (.08) |
Note. Dichotomous outcome, analyzed as the sole outcome in a logistic regression model.
Continuous outcome, analyzed as the sole outcome in a linear regression model.
In-prison aggression and victimization are correlated in one path model. These outcomes are square root transformed due to positive skew. Model fit indices are not reported because all models are just identified. MLR scaling correction factor for the aggression and victimization model = 1.91.
p < .10,
p < .05,
p < .01