Table 4.
The relationship of BPD diagnosis with CTS-2 aggression and victimization subscales during incarceration
| Aggression Subscales |
Negotiation | Psychological Aggression |
Physical Assaulta | Injury a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| B (SE) | B (SE) | B (SE) | B (SE) | |
| Age | −.12 (.07) | −.14* (.07) | −.06 (.08) | .11 (.06) |
| BPD Diagnosis | −.10 (.07) | .22** (.07) | −.03 (.08) | .01 (.09) |
| Victimization Subscales | Negotiation | Psychological Aggression | Physical Assaulta | Injury a |
|
| ||||
| B (SE) | B (SE) | B (SE) | B (SE) | |
|
| ||||
| Age | −.16* (.07) | −.03 (.07) | −.04 (.09) | .09 (.08) |
| BPD Diagnosis | −.14* (.07) | .24** (.07) | .02 (.08) | .03 (.08) |
Note. All aggression outcomes are correlated in one path model; all victimization outcomes are correlated in a separate path model.
a
Log transformed due to positive skew. Model fit indices are not reported because all models are just identified. MLR scaling correction factor for aggression subscale model = 1.91. MLR scaling correction factor for victimization subscale model = 1.74.
+
p < .10,
*
p < .05,
**
p < .01