Table 5.
rMDD > HC | rMDD < HC | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristica | 1: Bilateral PCC with CCN | 2: Right DMN with CCN/SEN | 3: R-HPF with DMN | 4: HPF with SMN | 5: Bilateral PCC with DMN |
CONVERGENT VALIDITY | |||||
RRS Total | 0.19 [−0.05, 0.41] |
0.38** [0.15, 0.57] |
−0.08 [−0.31, 0.16] |
−0.29* [−0.49, −0.05] |
0.03 [−0.27, 0.27] |
CC Factor | −0.21† [−0.42, 0.03] |
−0.12 [−0.34, 0.12] |
−0.13 [−0.35, 0.11] |
−0.13 [−0.35, 0.11] |
−0.08 [−0.31, 0.16] |
SLLT d' | −0.05 [−0.27, 0.17] |
−0.01 [−0.23, 0.21] |
0.23* [0.01, 0.43] |
−0.05 [−0.27, 0.18] |
0.12 [−0.11, 0.33] |
FEPT Happy Accuracyb | 0.01 [−0.23, 0.24] |
−0.04 [−0.27, 0.19] |
−0.27* [−0.47, −0.03] |
−0.24* [−0.45, −0.01] |
−0.06 [−0.29, 0.18] |
Sad Accuracy | −0.03 [−0.26, 0.20] |
−0.11 [−0.33, 0.13] |
−0.02 [−0.25, 0.22] |
−0.10 [−0.32, 0.14] |
−0.17 [−0.38, 0.07] |
DISEASE COURSE | |||||
HAM–D | 0.24* [0.02, 0.43] |
0.10 [−0.12, 0.31] |
0.06 [−0.16, 0.28] |
−0.30** [−0.48, −0.09] |
0.04 [−0.18, 0.26] |
Number of Episodesb | −0.07 [−0.22, 0.35] |
−0.20 [−0.46, 0.09] |
−0.15 [−0.42, 0.15] |
0.09 [−0.21, 0.36] |
0.02 [−0.27, 0.30] |
Age at Onsetb | −0.09 [−0.37, 0.20] |
−0.07 [−0.35, 0.22] |
0.17 [−0.12, 0.44] |
0.08 [−0.22, 0.36] |
0.10 [−0.19, 0.38] |
SPECIFICITY | |||||
Age | 0.07 [−0.15, 0.28] |
0.11 [−0.11, 0.32] |
0.18 [−0.04, 0.38] |
0.07 [−0.15, 0.28] |
0.09 [−0.13, 0.30] |
Verbal IQ | −0.02 [−0.24, 0.20] |
0.01 [−0.21, 0.22] |
–0.26* [−0.45, −0.04] |
–0.19† [−0.39, 0.03] |
−0.13 [−0.34, 0.09] |
PCA, Principle Components Analysis. Analyses included all subjects without missing data. Italics indicate a significant partial correlation after controlling for diagnosis (p < 0.05, one-tailed), which was only conducted following a significant initial correlation.
Some cognitive features and clinical variables were significantly correlated: verbal IQ was negatively related to SLLT d' (r = −0.25, p = 0.02), and residual HAM–D was positively related to both RRS total (r = 0.25, p = 0.04) and FEPT sad accuracy (r = 0.29, p = 0.01). No cognitive features were significantly correlated with each other.
Spearman's correlation ρ reported due to non-normal distribution.
p < 0.10,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, all two-tailed.