Table 3.
Bivariate linear regression models for HIV-related stigma and relevant covariates among rural PLWHA, Henan Province, China, 2014 (n = 239)
Variable | Total Stigma Score | Personalized Stigma | Disclosure Concern | Negative Self-Image | Concern With Public Attitudes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | |
Female | −1.09 (−4.24,2.07) | − 1.00 (− 2.60,0.60) | − 0.17 (− 1.06,0.72) | −0.28 (− 1.30,0.73) | −0.35 (− 2.22,1.51) |
Increasing age | − 0.53 (− 0.75,-0.31)⌘ | −0.26 (− 0.37,-0.15)⌘ | −0.14 (− 0.20,-0.07)⌘ | −0.13 (− 0.20,-0.06)⌘ | − 0.30 (− 0.43,-0.17)⌘ |
Increasing education level | 4.40 (1.02,7.78)§ | 1.93 (0.20,3.66)§ | 1.82 (0.89,2.76)⌘ | 0.83 (− 0.27,1.93)* | 2.50 (0.50,4.50)§ |
Living with spouse | 5.34 (1.47,9.22)¶ | 3.02 (1.05,4.99)¶ | 0.90 (− 0.20,2.01)* | 1.69 (0.43,2.94)¶ | 3.72 (1.44,6.00)⌘ |
Increasing yearly income | 1.35 (− 2.00,4.70) | 0.50 (− 1.21,2.20) | 0.72 (− 0.22,1.66)* | 0.01 (− 1.07,1.09) | 0.80 (− 1.18,2.77) |
Years since HIV diagnosis | −0.43 (− 0.91,0.05)* | −0.11 (− 0.36,0.14) | −0.13 (− 0.27,0.01)* | −0.15 (− 0.30,0.01)* | −0.27 (− 0.55,0.02)* |
Opportunistic infection | 4.54 (− 0.68, 9.76)* | 1.12 (− 1.55, 3.79) | 1.58 (0.12, 3.05)§ | 1.75 (0.07, 3.42)§ | 2.07 (− 1.02, 5.16)* |
Current ART treatment | 1.97 (−8.11,12.04) | 2.91(− 2.21,8.04) | −0.25(− 3.09,2.59) | −0.10(− 3.35,3.15) | 2.08(− 3.87,8.04) |
Better self-rated health status | −1.18 (− 4.22,1.85) | −0.39 (− 1.93,1.16) | −0.32 (− 1.17,0.54) | 0.12 (− 0.86,1.10) | −0.67 (− 2.47,1.12) |
Disclosed HIV status | −15.61 (− 29.64,-1.59)§ | −8.78 (− 15.91,-1.65)§ | −2.96 (− 6.94,1.01)* | −3.62 (− 8.16,0.93)* | −9.65 (− 17.93,-1.37)§ |
*p ≤ 0.2, §p < 0.05, ¶p < 0.01, ⌘p < 0.001
N.B.: A negative stigma score indicates less stigma. PLWHA People Living with HIV/AIDS
Opportunistic infection:History of at least one opportunistic infection (self-reported)