Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 15;18:54. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0510-1

Table 2.

The 90th percentile confidence intervals for all performance measure estimates of each method for Scenario 1 in Table 1 (corresponding to Fig. 1)

Measure K L R F L R R g P S A g P S W g P S WT g P S MWS
Sensitivity 10 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 0.50 0.00, 0.50 0.00, 0.50 0.00, 0.50 0.00, 0.50
20 0.25, 1.00 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25
30 0.33, 1.00 0.00, 0.33 0.00, 0.33 0.00, 0.17 0.00, 0.33 0.00, 0.33
40 0.50, 1.00 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25 0.00, 0.25
50 0.50, 0.90 0.00, 0.30 0.00, 0.30 0.00, 0.20 0.00, 0.20 0.00, 0.20
Specificity 10 0.50, 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00, 1.00 0.88, 1.00 0.88, 1.00 0.88, 1.00
20 0.56, 0.88 0.94, 1.00 0.94, 1.00 0.88, 1.00 0.94, 1.00 0.88, 1.00
30 0.54, 0.88 0.96, 1.00 0.96, 1.00 0.92, 1.00 0.92, 1.00 0.92, 1.00
40 0.56, 0.84 0.97, 1.00 0.97, 1.00 0.91, 1.00 0.94, 1.00 0.91, 1.00
50 0.57, 0.80 0.98, 1.00 0.98, 1.00 0.92, 1.00 0.95, 1.00 0.90, 1.00
PPV 10 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00
20 0.20, 0.67 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00
30 0.25, 0.58 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00
40 0.26, 0.55 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00
50 0.27, 0.53 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00 0.00, 1.00
NPV 10 0.75, 1.00 0.80, 0.89 0.80, 0.89 0.78, 0.89 0.78, 0.89 0.78, 0.89
20 0.80, 1.00 0.80, 0.84 0.80, 0.84 0.78, 0.84 0.79, 0.84 0.78, 0.84
30 0.82, 1.00 0.79, 0.86 0.79, 0.86 0.79, 0.83 0.79, 0.86 0.79, 0.85
40 0.84, 1.00 0.79, 0.84 0.79, 0.84 0.78, 0.84 0.79, 0.84 0.78, 0.84
50 0.84, 0.97 0.80, 0.85 0.80, 0.85 0.79, 0.83 0.79, 0.83 0.79, 0.83

K = number of providers; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value