Table 2.
RQ-1 | |
Study identifier | |
Year of publication | [2005–2015] |
Country of all author(s) | |
Authors’ background | [Biology/Ecology, Computer science/Engineering, Education] |
Publication type | [journal, conference proceedings] |
RQ-2 | |
Depicted organ(s) | [leaf, flower, fruit, stem, whole plant] |
No. of species | |
No. of images | |
Image source(s) | [own dataset, existing dataset] |
(a) own dataset | [fresh material, herbarium specimen, web] |
(b) existing dataset | [name, no. of species, no. of images, source] |
Image type | [photo, scan, pseudo-scan] |
Image background | [natural, plain] |
Considering: | |
(a) damaged leaves | [yes, no] |
(b) overlapped leaves | [yes, no] |
(c) compound leaves | [yes, no] |
RQ-3 | |
Studied organ | [leaf, flower, fruit, stem, whole plant] |
Studied feature(s) | [shape, color, texture, margin, vein] |
Studied descriptor(s) | |
RQ-4 | |
Utilized dataset | |
No. of species | |
Studied feature(s) | |
Applied classifier | |
Achieved accuracy | |
RQ-5 | |
Prototype name | |
Type of application | [mobile, web, desktop] |
Computation | [online, offline] |
Publicly available | [yes, no] |
Supported organ | [leaf, flower, multi-organ] |
Expected background | [plain, natural] |
aMultiple values possible